Tibet struggles against slow decline
As Dalai Lama ages, state control wipes cause for freedom off global radar
HONG KONG: Sixty years after the Dalai Lama fled into permanent Indian exile, the cause of Tibetan freedom that earned him a Nobel prize and a celebrity-studded international following has lost much of its momentum – neutralised, analysts say, by the passage of time and China’s rising global power.
Inside Tibet, Beijing has effectively wiped out any organised opposition to its iron-clad rule while outside, the once-vocal support of sympathetic governments and world leaders has dwindled to nearsilence in recent years despite the 14th Dalai Lama’s enduring personal popularity.
“The fate of Tibet is in the hands of the Chinese state ... Tibetans outside the region are not very relevant to the fate of Tibet and this includes the Dalai Lama,” said Nathan Hill, convener of Tibetan studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London.
In 2007, the Buddhist spiritual leader said his homeland was facing its “darkest period in 2,000 years”.
The next year, with the world’s eyes on China in the run-up to the 2008 Olympics, protests unfurled across Tibet, sparking a furious response from Beijing.
“You don’t see protests like that anymore,” said Kate Saunders of the US-based International Campaign for Tibet, attributing the shift in part to Tibetans abiding by the Dalai Lama’s message of non-violence and to Chinese state surveillance.
Although the Dalai Lama’s campaign largely focused on autonomy rather than independence, negotiations with China stalled in 2010 amid suspicion that Beijing was intentionally dragging on pointless talks, hoping international pressure would ease with his eventual death.
The 83-year-old has sought to preempt any attempt by Beijing to name his reincarnated successor, even announcing in 2011 that he may be the last in the lineage.
The officially atheist Communist Party has already shown that it will intervene in the reincarnation of vital figures in Tibetan Buddhism such as the Panchen Lama, who traditionally plays a significant role in choosing the Dalai Lama’s successor.
The boy chosen by the Dalai Lama to serve as the Panchen Lama was detained by Chinese authorities at the age of six and has not been seen since, with Beijing appointing its own candidate in 1995.
Although the exiled leader remains a popular speaker, he has cut back on his global engagements and has not met a world leader since 2016. Governments are wary of extending invitations to him for fear of angering Beijing.
As the exile-led movement loses momentum, Tibetans at home struggle to keep their traditions alive.
“Tibetans live in a totalitarian police state – if they challenge restrictions, they face the consequences,” said Gray Tuttle, a professor of modern Tibetan studies at Columbia University.
At least 150 Tibetans have set themselves on fire since 2009 in protest against Beijing, most of whom have died from their injuries. But the frequency of self-immolations has lessened.
China’s investment in the region includes a huge outlay on security to build a surveillance state that makes it harder to organise protests. Rights groups say a government campaign targeting the family and friends of protesters has also helped suppress dissent.
Beijing insists that Tibetans enjoy extensive freedoms and argues that it has brought economic growth to the mountainous region. The oppression of Uighurs in Xinjiang has also overtaken Tibet as the focus of China’s human rights critics.
When Germany’s top human rights official Barbel Kofler asked to visit Xinjiang last year, she was taken instead to Tibet – a sign of how much Beijing feels secure about the situation there, though foreign journalists are still barred from reporting independently there.
Many locals accuse Beijing of repressing their religion and diluting their culture, but the economic growth – boosted by government subsidies – has even seen Tibetan exiles return to the region.
Tibetologist Francoise Robin said Beijing had effectively sidelined any talk of freedom by pumping money into Tibet.
“This is what is paradoxical in the case of Tibet compared to other similar situations because China is a country ... that is on the rise. Often, in order for a rebellion, for a mass movement to rise, you need economic despair.” — AFP