Weinstein’s lawyers want trial moved, calling it a ‘circus’
NEW YORK: Harvey Weinstein’s lawyers went to court with a last-minute demand to halt jury selection and move his rape trial out of New York City, where they say intense publicity, protesters and even the consideration of supermodel Gigi Hadid as a juror have turned the case into a “media and entertainment circus”.
Weinstein’s lawyers detoured to the Manhattan appellate court for oral arguments hours after the 24-year-old Hadid was dismissed from the jury pool and as jurors were starting to be picked for the case. By lunchtime on Thursday, five jurors had been selected – three men and two women – from about 145 potential jurors who were invited back for additional questioning.
Weinstein’s lawyers, who floated similar concerns in a losing effort to move the trial in October, said a “carnival-like atmosphere” has taken hold during eight days of jury selection, making it impossible for Weinstein to get a fair trial in his hometown.
“The deluge of publicity adverse to Mr Weinstein has engulfed the potential jury pool resulting in untoward pressure upon jurors to convict a man demonised and prejudged guilty,” Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala wrote in court papers that spurred Thursday’s trip to the appellate court.
Weinstein, 67, is charged with raping a woman in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013 and sexually assaulting another in 2006. He has pleaded not guilty and said any sexual activity was consensual. If convicted, Weinstein could face life in prison.
Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, pointing to the plethora of potential jurors still in the running after pledging they could be impartial as evidence that the process is working. Moving to a smaller community in the state with a smaller jury pool would only make it more difficult to find jurors, they added.
As for the protests, prosecutor Valerie Figuerdo argued: “There’s no reason to think the jurors would be impacted by it because New Yorkers see protests all the time.”
The appellate court did not immediately rule on moving the trial.
The matter will go to a panel of judges with the aim of having a decision before opening statements, which could happen as early as next week.
Justice David Friedman, who heard Thursday’s arguments, declined a request from Weinstein’s lawyers to halt the trial until the panel rules.
Last week, Weinstein’s lawyers tried and failed to get jury selection halted for a “cooling off ” period after Los Angeles prosecutors announced charges against him there on the first day of the New York City trial.
The defence said the California charges, which allege Weinstein sexually assaulted one woman and raped another on back-to-back nights in February 2013, ushered in “a new wave of negative press.”
Next, they asked the judge, James Burke, to step aside for admonishing Weinstein and threatening to jail him for texting in the courtroom.
Burke rejected that request.