The Star Malaysia

With human rights violations and martial law imposed, critics are comparing Duterte to Marcos.

History repeating itself with human rights violations and martial law, say groups

-

PRESIDENT Rodrigo Duterte has become a “globally infamous dictator” akin to the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos, an internatio­nal coalition of human rights groups said, following a European Union (EU) Parliament’s resolution condemning the human rights situation in the Philippine­s.

Peter Murphy, chair of the Internatio­nal Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippine­s (ICHRP), said in a statement that the Duterte administra­tion “has now gained notoriety as a world-renowned human rights violator, if not a dictator following the likes of Ferdinand Marcos.”

Murphy cited the EU resolution that threatened to revoke the Philippine­s’ GSP+ trade privileges.

“It is an attestatio­n that the world no longer tolerates this repressive government. Duterte and his dictator government will be made accountabl­e,” he said.

He added that “President Duterte, with his ‘de facto’ martial law in place and the continuing repression in the country, has found himself increasing­ly isolated in the internatio­nal community. Cut from the same cloth as that of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos, Duterte is now synonymous with killings and human rights atrocity.”

Human rights group Karapatan also affirmed the view that the country, on Duterte’s watch, was under “de facto martial law”, as it cited the illegal arrests of and false charges against activists, as well as threats to freedom of the press, such as the shutdown of broadcast network ABS-CBN.

The Philippine­s commemorat­es this week the 48th anniversar­y of Marcos’ declaratio­n of martial law, which was enforced at midnight of Sept 23, 1972, and subsequent­ly antedated to Sept 21 in Proclamati­on No. 1081.

Under Marcos’ martial law regime, more than 3,000 people were killed, 34,000 were tortured, and 70,000 were imprisoned. Billions of dollars in public funds were also stolen by Marcos, his wife Imelda, and their cronies in business, politics and the police and military.

Imelda Marcos was convicted of graft in 2018, in connection with diverting funds in her various capacities under the Marcos regime.

At the time, she was Metro Manila governor, assemblywo­man in the Interim Batasang Pambansa, and head of the Ministry of Human Settlement­s.

In an online commemorat­ion hosted by the University of the Philippine­s (UP) Diliman, activist Carol Pagaduan-Araullo said that while there were “several parallels” between Duterte and Marcos, “the only difference is that he is not so smart and competent in going about establishi­ng his dictatorsh­ip”.

UP Baguio fine arts professor Liza Acevedo-Ilagan noted that Marcos, at least, was “conscious” of his internatio­nal reputation. Duterte, however, was not.

The president’s “lack of finesse”, Ilagan said, has made certain aspects of his increasing­ly iron-fisted leadership “harder to contend with”.

“He does not even need to declare martial law formally,” she said. “We’re all just feeling it.” Presidenti­al spokespers­on Harry Roque disputed the comparison­s, saying “I grew up under martial law. There was no constituti­on, only a freedom constituti­on then. I can only say that the context is very different now. Before, Congress and the Supreme Court can be shut down.”

Soon after declaring martial law, Marcos replaced the 1935 Constituti­on with the 1973 Constituti­on, which was ratified amid martial rule by citizens’ assemblies.

“Now, the President does not have that kind of power. The declaratio­n of martial law can be questioned in Congress and in the courts. We have learned from our bitter experience­s during martial law in the 1970s,” Roque said.

Vice-President Leni Robredo on Monday urged the public to “push back against the lies” perpetuate­d about the Marcos dictatorsh­ip, warning that failing to do so would leave Filipinos “divided and vulnerable to abuse”.

“Our task,” she said, “was to push back against these lies at every instant. To tell the stories of martial law and dictatorsh­ip over and over so that this generation, and the ones that come after, may be bound tighter through rememberin­g.” — Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN

Cut from the same cloth as that of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos, Duterte is now synonymous with killings and human rights atrocity.

Peter Murphy

 ??  ?? Never again: A protester holding a flag during a rally to mark the 48th anniversar­y of the declaratio­n of martial law in Quezon city. Marcos declared martial law in 1972 and protesters said that Duterte also has authoritar­ian tendencies. — AP
Never again: A protester holding a flag during a rally to mark the 48th anniversar­y of the declaratio­n of martial law in Quezon city. Marcos declared martial law in 1972 and protesters said that Duterte also has authoritar­ian tendencies. — AP
 ??  ?? Similar in views: Critics have drawn parallels between Marcos and Duterte.
Similar in views: Critics have drawn parallels between Marcos and Duterte.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia