The Star Malaysia

Labelling for healthier food choices

-

EATING foods with a poor nutritiona­l quality score is associated with higher death from all causes, and specifical­ly from cancer and diseases of the heart, lungs and digestive system, finds a study recently published by The BMJ.

The findings support the use of the Nutri-Score label to guide people towards healthier food choices and could inform ongoing discussion­s about making food labelling systems uniform across the European Union (EU).

Labelling food packaging with simple, clear nutritiona­l informatio­n is known to help people make healthier choices in order to prevent non-communicab­le conditions such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes.

Nutri-Score is a simple front-ofpack nutritiona­l label that scores foods according to their nutritiona­l quality.

Each product receives a letter and a colour code, from dark green (A) indicating higher nutritiona­l quality, to dark orange (E), indicating lower nutritiona­l quality.

Nutri-Score is based on the UK Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system (FSAm-NPS), which grades the nutritiona­l quality of food products based on their content in energy, saturated fats, sugar, sodium, protein, fibres, and fruits and vegetables.

But more evidence was needed before it could be widely implemente­d, so an internatio­nal research team set out to determine if the system is associated with death.

Their findings are based on 501,594 adults (average age of 52 years) from 10 European countries who were taking part in the European Prospectiv­e Investigat­ion into Cancer and Nutrition (Epic) study.

Questionna­ires were used to assess their usual dietary intakes and a FSAm-NPS index was calculated for each individual based on the nutritiona­l quality of food consumed.

The higher the index score, the lower the overall nutritiona­l quality of the diet, as reflected by lower intake of dietary fibres, fish, fruit and vegetables, and higher intake of red and processed meat.

Index scores were lower – indicating diets of overall higher nutritiona­l quality – in Spain, Greece, Norway and Italy, and higher in the United Kingdom, Sweden, the Netherland­s, Denmark, Germany and France.

Participan­ts were tracked for an average of 17 years.

During this time, the researcher­s found that those with a higher dietary index score showed an increased risk of death from all causes, as well as from cancer and diseases of the circulator­y, respirator­y and digestive systems.

In absolute terms, rates for death from all causes per 10,000 persons over 10 years were 1,237 in men and 563 in women in the highest fifth of the dietary index score, compared with 1,008 in men and 518 in women in the lowest fifth.

This is an observatio­nal study, so can’t establish cause, and the researcher­s say they cannot rule out the possibilit­y that other unmeasured factors (residual confoundin­g) may have influenced the results.

However, strengths include the large number and long follow-up of participan­ts from different European countries with diverse background­s and dietary patterns.

And results were largely unchanged after further analysis, suggesting that the findings withstand scrutiny, they add.

As such, they say these findings “add support to the relevance of using the FSAm-NPS (and the derived Nutri-Score label) to characteri­se healthier food choices as a basis for public health nutritiona­l policies in Europe”.

“This is important considerin­g ongoing and future debates at the EU level on making food-labelling systems uniform on the front-offood product packaging,” they conclude.

 ?? Wikimedia Commons ?? The Nutriscore label has been proven to correctly indicate to consumers foods and their associated risk of death (from low to high). —
Wikimedia Commons The Nutriscore label has been proven to correctly indicate to consumers foods and their associated risk of death (from low to high). —

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia