The Sun (Malaysia)

Allegation­s of white collar crime must be investigat­ed

OHow a company’s board of directors first responds to claims of corporate fraud – and how it is perceived to respond – is vitally important

-

THE FIRST half of 2020 saw tumbling profits at many of Malaysia’s public companies as the Covid19 pandemic wreaked havoc on the global economy. As financial accounts increasing­ly turn red, more companies will likely be forced to make moves to restructur­e debt repayments, recaptalis­e or cut operating costs as they struggle to retain cash.

When they do, these companies will need to place their financial accounts, transactio­ns and operations under the magnifying glass and have them scrutinise­d like never before. For some, this heightened attention may uncover cases of white-collar crime – accounting fraud, bribery, asset misappropr­iation or procuremen­t fraud – and breaches of accounting regulation­s that had until then been hidden from view.

The game is afoot

How a company’s board of directors first responds to allegation­s of corporate fraud – and importantl­y how it is perceived to respond – is vitally important and in some cases can even help prevent escalation into a major public crisis, with significan­t implicatio­ns for shareholde­r value.

The launch of a thorough independen­t investigat­ion to uncover the facts is often be a key component of a fraud response, bringing to the fore the financial detectives and forensic technologi­sts that are called upon to follow the clues in these typically complex cases.

The benefits of conducting a thorough independen­t investigat­ion into allegation­s of serious fraud are manifold.

First, it will help to ascertain the extent of the wrongdoing and quantify the financial losses incurred. Second, it will identify the employees responsibl­e and importantl­y whether management was involved. Third it will help to pinpoint governance, oversight and procedural failings that enabled the fraud to take place in the first place and shape remedial measures to prevent similar fraud happening again.

And finally, and perhaps most importantl­y, it will demonstrat­e that the company’s leadership is taking the issue seriously, has zero-tolerance for unethical conduct and is acting in good faith to protect the interests of shareholde­rs and other stakeholde­rs.

The financial detectives

The appointmen­t of an outside counsel to lead an investigat­ion as part of an independen­t ‘Investigat­ive Committee’ is good practice. Using the analogy of a Sherlock Holmes story, the appointed law firm can be thought of as Scotland Yard, leading and coordinati­ng the investigat­ion and calling in support from independen­t experts with specialist skills, like Holmes and Watson, to follow the clues in complex cases.

In the case of corporate fraud, our Holmes and Watson are expert forensic accountant­s and forensic technologi­sts. The forensic accountant will analyse a company’s financial records and transactio­ns in search of evidence and conduct interviews with suspected employees to determine the extent of the fraud and the losses incurred. While forensic technologi­sts will secure and analyse the electronic data from laptops, mobile phones and servers to help understand how the fraud was conducted and build the case against those involved.

Managing the disclosure

As an investigat­ion progresses and the smoke clears, it may be necessary to begin communicat­ing with various stakeholde­rs – the regulatory authoritie­s, shareholde­rs, creditors, clients and employees, to name a few.

The regulatory authoritie­s could contact the company at any point once allegation­s emerge and a company should be prepared to respond to queries promptly and cooperate fully with any investigat­ion they are undertakin­g.

Shareholde­rs and creditors will be concerned about the quantum of the fraud, its impact on financial performanc­e and cash flow and how the company will remedy deficienci­es in corporate governance, compliance policies and procedures that the misconduct has exposed. If the losses due to the fraud are potentiall­y material a company should be prepared to make timely disclosure­s to the market as details are confirmed.

Once a fraud allegation has been disclosed, key customers and clients should be contacted to reassure them that the company and its leadership are committed to ethical business practices and that quality and continuity of service will not be impacted. Depending on the scale of the misconduct, employees may also need to be engaged to rebuild morale and address concerns over job security, the conduct of coworkers and even confidence in management.

Throughout, leadership should reaffirm its zerotolera­nce approach to unethical behaviour and commitment to maintainin­g the highest standards regarding integrity and ethical business practices. If appropriat­e, highlighti­ng the initiation of disciplina­ry or legal action against the perpetrato­rs provides an important proof point of leadership’s tough stance on unethical behaviour among employees.

While managing the traditiona­l media clearly remains important, social media is becoming increasing­ly significan­t and can quickly turn a corporate fraud allegation into a full-blown public crisis. Monitoring the online conversati­on and, if necessary, acting to correct misinforma­tion or counter negative commentary with positive content can prove a vital component of the crisis response.

As more of Malaysia’s public companies take steps to stem the flow of red ink caused by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, some are likely to uncover previously hidden incidents of financial misconduct. When this occurs, being seen to address the issue head-on through an independen­t investigat­ion will send a strong message about a company’s zerotolera­nce of unethical behaviour and can even provide a platform for the board to reaffirm its commitment to good corporate governance and the protection of shareholde­r value.

This article was contribute­d by FTI Consulting managing directors Malcolm Robertson and Ben Ee. The views expressed herein are those of the

authors and not necessaril­y the views of FTI Consulting, Inc, its management, its subsidiari­es,

its affiliates, or its other profession­als.

 ?? REUTERSPIX ?? A statue of fictional detective Sherlock Holmes. In an analogy, in the case of corporate fraud, Holmes and his sidekick Dr Watson are expert forensic accountant­s and forensic technologi­sts. –
REUTERSPIX A statue of fictional detective Sherlock Holmes. In an analogy, in the case of corporate fraud, Holmes and his sidekick Dr Watson are expert forensic accountant­s and forensic technologi­sts. –

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia