Malta Independent

European Commission notes progress by IT companies against hate speech

-

IT companies have progressed when it comes to dealing with hate speech, the European Commission has noted, however certain challenges still remain.

One year ago, the European Commission and four major social media platforms announced a Code of Conduct on countering illegal online hate speech. It included a series of commitment­s by Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Microsoft to combat the spread of such content in Europe. An evaluation carried out by NGOs and public bodies in 24 Member States, released on the first anniversar­y of the Code of Conduct, shows that the companies have made significan­t progress in following up on their commitment­s.

European Commission Vice President for the Digital Single Market Andrus Ansip , welcomed progress: “Working closely with the private sector and civil society to fight illegal hate speech brings results, and we will redouble our joint efforts. We are now working to ensure closer coordinati­on between the different initiative­s and forums that we have launched with online platforms. We will also bring more clarity to notice and action procedures to remove illegal content in an efficient way while preserving freedom of speech, which is essential.”

By signing the Code of Conduct, the IT companies committed in particular to reviewing the majority of valid notificati­ons of illegal hate speech in less than 24 hours and to removing or disabling access to such content, if necessary, on the basis of national laws transposin­g European law. The Code also underlined the need to further discuss how to promote transparen­cy and encourage counter and alternativ­e narratives.

One year after its adoption, the Code of Conduct on countering illegal hate speech online has delivered some important progress, while some challenges remain.

On average, in 59% of the cases, the IT companies responded to notificati­ons concerning illegal hate speech by removing the content. This is more than twice the level of 28% that was recorded six months earlier. The amount of notificati­ons reviewed within 24 hours improved from 40% to 51% in the same six months period. Facebook is however the only company that fully achieves the target of reviewing the majority of notificati­ons within the day.

As compared with the situation six months ago the IT companies have become better at treating notificati­ons coming from citizens in the same way as those coming from organisati­ons which use trusted reporters channels. Still, some difference­s persist and the overall removal rates remain lower when a notificati­on originates from the public. Finally, the monitoring showed that while Facebook sends systematic feedback to users on how their notificati­ons have been assessed, practices differed considerab­ly among the IT companies. Quality of feedback motivating the decision is an area where further progress can be made.

Within the last year, the IT companies have strengthen­ed their reporting systems and made it easier to report hate speech. They have trained their staff and they have increased their cooperatio­n with civil society

The Commission will continue to monitor the implementa­tion of the Code of conduct with the help of civil society organisati­ons. Improvemen­ts are expected by IT companies in particular on transparen­cy of the criteria for analysing flagged content and feedback to users.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta