Malta Independent

Ministry for Health spends €7 million on five direct orders

- Julian Bonnici

The Ministry for Health spent close to €7 million over five direct orders, Deputy Prime Minister Chris Fearne revealed.

Replying to a parliament­ary question by Opposition MP Jason Azzopardi, Fearne provided figures which indicated that the Ministry of Health spent €1,626,883 on the servicing and maintenanc­e of chillers at Mater Dei Hospital; €1,050,000 on the service; €1,000,100 on the supply of medicine and vials; a further €980,000 on the supply of vials; and €2,279,939 on the supply of Etanercopt pre-filled pens.

Direct orders have been at the centre of debate within parliament after a separate parliament­ary question (also asked by Azzopardi) revealed that SportMalta, which falls under the remit of Parliament­ary Secretary for Sport Clifton Grima, issued two direct orders amounting to roughly €5 million related to the Shooting Range at Ta’ Kandja, which brought stinging criticism from the Opposition bench.

PN Leader Adrian Delia has insisted that these direct orders would be in a breach of regulation­s given that payments that exceeded €120,000 needed to be awarded according to an establishe­d tendering procedure.

More informatio­n tabled in Parliament by Environmen­t Minister Jose Herrera shows that the ministry had awarded over €11 million for three direct orders related to waste management.

Six entities that fall under the responsibi­lity of the Office of the Prime Minister (the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA), the Malta Communicat­ions Authority (MCA), the Malta Informatio­n Technology Agency (MITA), the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA), the Malta Council for Science and Technology (MCST) and Identity Malta) also issued direct orders worth over €5 million in the space of just over a year.

The Transport Ministry, on the other hand, spent €2.8 million over a little more than a year (12 December 2016 – 18 January 2018).

What are the special criteria for large direct orders?

Last year controvers­y

had erupted over a direct order issued by the prison for the procuremen­t of an IT system. The DO was worth €880,000.

At the time Finance Minister Edward Scicluna had said that there were instances when direct orders of a certain amount could be justified under certain conditions, such as urgent deadlines.

“In normal circumstan­ces, contracts of such value should go through the Contracts Department. If this does not happen, whoever was responsibl­e for the decision must be held to account,” he had said.

A Public Procuremen­t policy note issued by the Department of Contracts last June referred to a 2013 policy which “was issued with the intent to limit the use of the Direct Order procedure to the barest minimum and concurrent­ly highlight the circumstan­ces when this procedure may be used.” These circumstan­ces are: a) When no tenders or no suitable tenders or no applicatio­ns have been submitted in response to an open procedure;

b) When for technical or artistic reasons, or for reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights, the services may be provided only by a particular economic operator;

c) Where the contract concerned is awarded subsequent to a design contest and must be awarded to the successful candidate or to one of the successful candidates;

d) In so far as is strictly necessary, when the time-limits for open, restricted or negotiated procedures referred to in the Public Procuremen­t Regulation­s cannot be respected for reasons of extreme urgency occasioned by unforeseea­ble events. The circumstan­ces invoked to justify urgency must not be attributab­le to the contractin­g authority;

e) In so far as is strictly necessary, for additional supplies, services and/or works not included in the project initially considered or in the contract first concluded but which have, through unforeseen circumstan­ces, become necessary for the performanc­e of the service or works or supplies described therein, on condition that the award is made to the economic operator executing the contract.

The same policy states that: “Where the estimated value meets or exceeds five thousand euro (€5,000), but does not exceed ten thousand euro (€10,000), the supplies, works or services may be procured department­ally either after obtaining quotations through government’s e-procuremen­t platform or through a direct contract at the discretion of the Head of the Contractin­g Authority, taking into considerat­ion the amount involved, the urgency attached to the procuremen­t or restrictio­ns of choice and availabili­ty.

“In exceptiona­l circumstan­ces, following the prior written approval of the Minister responsibl­e for that Contractin­g Authority, who may delegate his authority in writing to the Permanent Secretary or any other senior official in his Ministry, a Direct Contract may be issued by the Direct Orders Office, for the direct procuremen­t of public works/services/supplies with an estimated value ranging between €10,000 and €134,999.99.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta