Malta Independent

PA Board to decide three potentiall­y controvers­ial applicatio­ns in September

- ■ Kevin Schembri Orland

September is set to be an interestin­g month for the Planning Authority Board, with a number of applicatio­ns which could cause some controvers­y set to be decided.

So far there are three items of interest on the agenda of the PA’s highest board.

One of the applicatio­ns set to be decided revolves around the proposed master plan for the American University of Malta’s campus is Cospicua.

This includes the change of use of a disused building known as the Knights’ Building into an educationa­l institutio­n consisting of internal alteration­s and constructi­on of additional floors; constructi­on of an administra­tive building between the British and the Knights’ Buildings, including alteration to the public staircase; and constructi­on of a new educationa­l building along Triq 31 ta’ Marzu as a new wing to the Knights’ Building.

The American University of Malta has been a topic of controvers­y for a number of years, ever since it was originally announced to take up part of Żonqor Point.

For now, the campus is centred around Cospicua. This particular applicatio­n saw some concerns raised by objectors. Some argued that, “considerin­g the very low uptake of the AUM educationa­l services to date, and the lack of any positive multiplier effect in the local community and the country as a whole, it is premature to facilitate further AUM expansion.”

Others also argued that the proposed additional floors would obstruct Isla bastions and detract from the cultural and unique architectu­ral heritage of the area. “The developmen­t will also result in the loss of heritage.”

Some lamented “the lack of any consultati­on and considerat­ion of the needs of local people who indeed have repeatedly requested that this last remaining area at the heart of Cospicua should be restored for the people and by the people retaining its historical identity and providing space and opportunit­ies for local entreprene­urs and citizens of all walks of life to meet, work, cooperate and enjoy in a creative and environmen­tally friendly hub.”

Indeed, while the proposal is recommende­d for approval by the case officer, one of the conditions is that this developmen­t permission does not allow developmen­t above existing street level of building ‘C’ (the excavation of existing surface car park and adjoining roads ib Triq San Pawl and constructi­on of a multilevel undergroun­d parking for 180 parking spaces with a student accommodat­ion building above) and that a separate full developmen­t applicatio­n shall be submitted within six months from the date of issue of this developmen­t permission to enable further assessment in terms of massing, height, architectu­ral treatment and cultural heritage.

Another one of the applicatio­ns is for the proposed constructi­on of a petrol station and auto repair and maintenanc­e centre instead of an existing open storage yard, on Valletta Road, Mqabba. The proposed site is located Outside the Developmen­t Zone (ODZ). The total site area is of circa 2,580 square metres, and consists of a levelled concrete platform used for the production and stockpilin­g of concrete blocks. The site is surrounded by a number of quarries, a batching plant, stone work factory and rural land.

This full developmen­t permission applicatio­n is for the constructi­on of a fuel station with ancillary facilities, including 12 filling points; a 200-square-metre service station shop; office and toilet facilities; three car wash services; three drying areas and more.

The case officer noted that there is no sufficient justificat­ion from a planning point of view for the proposed new site since it would give rise to unacceptab­le developmen­t, particular­ly since the site is not listed as suitable for a new fuel station under the Fuel Service Stations Policy. The case officer recommends that the applicatio­n be refused.

Fuel station applicatio­ns have, in recent years, seen public concern, given that a number of environmen­talists argue that the island has enough stations as is and that more will contribute to the car-use mentality. Currently, a proposal for a revision of the fuel station policy is in the works; however, the government has been accused of dragging its feet.

The third applicatio­n pertains to offices in Valletta’s Old Bakery Street and Strait Street. The applicatio­n is a proposed extension to existing offices, which would see a number of floors added. The cultural superinten­dence objected to the applicatio­n, “as this will have an unacceptab­le negative impact on the streetscap­e and skyline of Valletta, an Area of High Landscape Value and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The proposal should be revised limiting roof structures to one additional floor, in line with the setback of abutting commitment­s.” The Planning Directorat­e had recommende­d refusing the applicatio­n, arguing, among other things, that the proposed height of developmen­t runs counter to objectives of the Strategic Plan for Environmen­t and Developmen­t which promote a context driven approach for the control of building heights within Urban Conservati­on Areas in order to protect the traditiona­l urban skyline.

During a Planning Board meeting held on 9 May 2019, all the members present expressed their intention to go against the recommenda­tion of the Planning Directorat­e and thus the applicatio­n was deferred.

“Revised plans were requested as discussed during the meeting, i.e. the retention of levels 2, 3 and 4 as originally proposed but including a redesign of the facade to extend it up to the side party line. Level 5 to be amended as per second option presented during the meeting, i.e. receding the boardroom further from Triq l-Ifran... The updated plans are in line with the requests set out by the Planning Board and respect Sanitary Laws and Regulation­s. Revised conditions have been prepared and drawing numbers updated accordingl­y.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta