Malta Independent

Final decision on Gżira hotel extension replacing old townhouses to be taken on Thursday

- ■ Albert Galea

The Planning Authority will take a final decision on a proposed extension to a hotel in Gżira on Thursday, which would see the replacemen­t of three old townhouses, after it indicated that it would go against the recommenda­tion of the Planning Directorat­e and approve the applicatio­n.

The applicatio­n is for an extension to the Blubay Hotel in Frederick Ponsonby Street, which would see the hotel have a total frontage of 43.5 metres, a height of nine floors (one receded), and a room capacity of 205.

The streetscap­e is characteri­sed by residentia­l units and small commercial outlets, with a height that varies between two and four floors, with the latter closer to the Gżira promenade, 180 metres from the site.

The site had already been subject to a proposal to incorporat­e one townhouse into its building and build up an extra floor, which was approved in spite of the fact that the Planning Directorat­e had recommende­d otherwise.

This particular applicatio­n seeks to spread the hotel further, almost doubling its capacity from 104 rooms to 205 rooms and replacing a set of townhouses. Concern was raised on the latter point by the Superinten­dence of Cultural Heritage which stipulated that the old facades should be retained.

In reply to the Superinten­dence, it was argued that the request to retain the facades “should be considered redundant bearing in mind that the area has a number of commitment­s for redevelopm­ent and only a few of these facades remain. Moreover, the facades in question are not in condition to be retained.”

This reasoning was not enough for the Superinten­dence, which insisted on the integratio­n of the facades “to ensure that the value of the streetscap­e and the Design Priority Area is not compromise­d.”

The same reasoning was not deemed sufficient enough for the case officer either, who recommende­d that the project be refused namely due to the total demolition of these three townhouses.

In fact, the case officer wrote that the argument goes against the Strategic Plan for Environmen­t and Developmen­t (SPED), which seeks “to improve the townscape and environmen­t in historic cores and their setting with a presumptio­n against demolition of property worthy of conservati­on.”

“The proposed total demolition of three existing townhouses will result in the loss of historical fabric, which will also alter the surviving streetscap­e within Gżira’s Design Priority Area, diminishin­g its cultural significan­ce,” the case officer wrote as the reason for the recommenda­tion for refusal.

“The proposal, which is objected to by the Superinten­dence of Cultural Heritage, runs counter to Thematic Objective 8 of the Strategic Plan for Environmen­t and Developmen­t, which aims for the safeguardi­ng and enhancemen­t of the cultural heritage,” he wrote.

However, in spite of the case officer’s recommenda­tion to refuse the applicatio­n, the Planning Authority board voted on 26 September to overturn the recommenda­tion and approve it.

During the meeting, the board members noted that revised elevations were required in which “the lower two floors should incorporat­e the traditiona­l architectu­ral elements and proportion­s, including closed timber balconies, of the existing buildings on site.”

Revised plans which incorporat­e the timber balcony of one of the townhouses were submitted earlier this month in view of this requiremen­t, as stipulated by the Planning Authority’s board.

The law dictates that when the Planning Authority board votes against the recommenda­tion of the Planning Directorat­e’s case officer then a second vote to confirm the decision must be taken. This decision will be taken on Thursday.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta