Malta Independent

Guidelines for visual integrity of scheduled buildings and protection of monuments published

-

Greater vigilance will be exercised when assessing and determinin­g proposed developmen­t applicatio­ns which fall in close proximity to a scheduled building or monument, the Minister for the Environmen­t, Climate Change and Planning Aaron Farrugia announced yesterday.

This approach is being adopted after the Planning Authority published clearer guidelines on how to identify, interpret, and treat the context of scheduled buildings. These guidelines seek to safeguard the context and setting of sites that carry heritage value.

During a visit to Villa Frere, a site which was recently granted Grade 1 protection by the Planning Authority, Minister Aaron Farrugia said that the concept of intelligen­t planning “also requires us to protect scheduled buildings and monuments. This is the reason we are launching these clear guidelines for workers, the Board, Commission­s, and case officers to refer to when making decisions. These sites very often have historic value. This is a heritage passed on from our forefather­s and it is our duty to pass them on to upcoming generation­s. Intelligen­t planning is planning which is forward-looking,” Minister Farrugia said.

The Planning Directorat­e, when assessing a developmen­t applicatio­n that is in close proximity to a scheduled building or monument must – at screening stage or following the validation of the applicatio­n, identify the proximity of the setting of the scheduled property – make a detailed assessment of the impacts of the proposed developmen­t on the protected building and identify the mitigation measures to be taken. This assessment process must be supported by recommenda­tions made by the Superinten­dence of Cultural Heritage (SCH), a government statement read.

“Once the extent of the context is establishe­d on the recommenda­tions of the Superinten­dence of Cultural Heritage (SCH), an applicant will be required to provide the Planning Directorat­e with a complete photograph­ic inventory and character appraisal of the context. To further assess the visual implicatio­ns and potential impacts on the scheduled building, photomonta­ges from strategic viewpoints will also be required.”

“The SCH has the right to request that submitted drawings should include streetscap­es showing full details of the adjoining buildings and existing street levels. The streetscap­e elevations should span across side streets when sites near or at corners are being proposed for developmen­t,” the statement continued.

The proposed architectu­ral design should not only respect the context but should also aim to blend in with the surroundin­gs. The Heritage Planning Unit will assess these cases prior to validation and determine whether the submission has satisfied the relevant criteria to enable adequate evaluation during the processing of any other informatio­n deemed necessary, the statement explained.

Martin Saliba, Chairperso­n of the PA’s Executive Council said “Each scheduled building is located within a spatial context with which it relates to in different aspects. The setting is, therefore, an essential part of the building and how it is experience­d.” He added: “For this reason, the spatial context deserves specific attention. These procedural guidelines better spell out how we intend not to compromise our built cultural heritage.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta