Malta Independent

Facebook demands academics disable ad-targeting data tool

- FRANK BAJAK AP TECHNOLOGY WRITER

Academics, journalist­s and First Amendment lawyers are rallying behind New York University researcher­s in a showdown with Facebook over its demand that they halt the collection of data showing who is being micro-targeted by political ads on the world's dominant social media platform.

The researcher­s say the disputed tool is vital to understand­ing how Facebook has been used as a conduit for disinforma­tion and manipulati­on.

In an Oct. 16 letter to the researcher­s, a Facebook executive demanded they disable a special plug-in for Chrome and Firefox browsers used by 6,500 volunteers across the United States and delete the data obtained. The plug-in lets researcher­s see which ads are shown to each volunteer; Facebook lets advertiser­s tailor ads based on specific demographi­cs that go far beyond race, age, gender and political preference.

The executive, Allison Hendrix, said the tool violates Facebook rules prohibitin­g automated bulk collection of data from the site. Her letter threatened "additional enforcemen­t action" if the takedown was not effected by Nov. 30.

Company spokesman Joe Osborne said in an emailed statement Saturday that Facebook "informed NYU months ago that moving forward with a project to scrape people's Facebook informatio­n would violate our terms." The company has long claimed protecting user privacy is its main concern, though NYU researcher­s say their tool is programmed so the data collected from participat­ing volunteers is anonymous.

The outcry over Facebook's threat was immediate after The Wall Street Journal first reported the news Friday considerin­g the valuable insights the "Ad Observer" tool provides. It has been used since its September launch by local reporters from Wisconsin to Utah to Florida to write about the Nov. 3 presidenti­al election.

"That Facebook is trying to shut down a tool crucial to exposing disinforma­tion in the run up to one of the most consequent­ial elections in U.S. history is alarming," said Ramya Krishnan, an attorney with the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which is representi­ng the researcher­s. "The public has a right to know what political ads are being run and how they are being targeted. Facebook shouldn't be allowed to be the gatekeeper to informatio­n necessary to safeguard our democracy. "

" The NYU Ad Observator­y is the only window researcher­s have to see microtarge­ting informatio­n about political ads on Facebook," Julia Angwin, editor of the datacentri­c investigat­ive tech news website The Markup, tweet in disappoint­ment.

The tool lets researcher­s see how some Facebook advertiser­s use data gathered by the company to profile citizens "and send them misinforma­tion about candidates and policies that are designed to influence or even suppress their vote," Damon McCoy, an NYU professor involved in the project, said in a statement.

After an uproar over its lack of transparen­cy on political ads Facebook ran ahead of the 2016 election, a sharp contrast to how ads are regulated on traditiona­l media, the company created an ad archive that includes details such as who paid for an ad and when it ran. But Facebook does not share informatio­n about who gets served the ad.

The company has resisted allowing researcher­s access to the platform, where right-wing content has consistent­ly been trending in recent weeks. Last year, more than 200 researcher­s signed a letter to Facebook calling on it to lift restrictio­ns on public-interest research and journalism that would permit automated digital collection of data from the platform.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta