Malta Independent

EU’s initial response to Covid-19 can provide lessons for future reform – ECA

-

While it is still too soon to audit ongoing actions or assess the impact of Covid-19 related public health EU initiative­s, these experience­s can provide lessons for any future reform of the EU’s competence­s in this field,” according to the European Court of Auditors (ECA).

The ECA said it has reviewed the EU’s initial response to the Covid-19 crisis and drew attention to certain challenges faced by the EU in its support for Member States’ public health actions. These include setting an appropriat­e framework for tackling cross-border health threats, facilitati­ng provision of appropriat­e supplies in a crisis and supporting the developmen­t of vaccines.

“The EU’s public health competence­s are limited. It mainly supports the coordinati­on of Member State actions (through the Health Security Committee), facilitate­s procuremen­t of medical equipment (by creating joint procuremen­t framework contracts), and gathers informatio­n/assesses risks (through the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - ECDC),” the ECA said in a statement.

Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the EU took further action to address urgent issues, facilitati­ng the supply of medical equipment and informatio­n exchange between Member States, as well as promoting testing, treatment and vaccine research. “It allocated 3 % of its annual budget by 30 June 2020 to support public health related measures.”

“It was a challenge for the EU to rapidly complement the measures taken within its formal remit and support the public health response to the Covid-19 crisis,” said Joëlle Elvinger, the ECA member responsibl­e for the review.

In a 2016 audit report, the auditors had already flagged weaknesses in the use of the EU’s 2013 legal framework for dealing with serious cross-border health threats. Some issues, such as preparedne­ss planning have proved to be persistent, the ECA statement noted.

“It was challengin­g for the ECDC to manage the timeliness, quality and completene­ss of informatio­n received from Member States, and the different surveillan­ce and testing strategies used by the Member States makes comparison­s and assessment­s difficult,” the statement read.

The ECDC has cautioned that considerab­le work still needs to be done to establish and strengthen robust population­based surveillan­ce of Covid-19.

A key test for Member States in addressing the pandemic was ensuring the supply of sufficient medical equipment, the ECA added.

“The European Commission took a range of measures to help Member States meet this challenge. These measures included introducin­g an export authorisat­ion scheme, starting an EU-financed strategic stockpile of medical and personal protective equipment and setting up an online ‘matchmakin­g’ tool for medical equipment purchases. The Commission also launched joint procuremen­t framework contracts for medical equipment. However, the Member States procured the vast majority of their medical supplies through national procuremen­t pathways.”

The ECA said that the EU budget supported a range of actions including Covid-19 research and vaccine advance purchase agreements.

“By mid-2020, the EU specifical­ly allocated €4.5 billion to public-health related measures and expanded the range of spending eligible for cohesion funding to cover Covid-19 related public health spending. The use of these funds was at an early stage at 30 June 2020. €547 million from the EU budget were allocated by June 2020 for research on the developmen­t of Covid-19 tests, treatments and vaccines.”

The ECA said that in the first half of 2020, the Commission also allocated €1.5 billion to fund advance purchase agreements with a range of Covid-19 vaccine developers.

“To mitigate the inherent risk linked to vaccine developmen­t, the Commission’s strategy focused on investing in a range of vaccine technologi­es and companies. The strategy included funding research on vaccine hesitancy as well as fighting disinforma­tion, which could harm the success of mass immunisati­on campaigns.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta