Malta Independent

Applicatio­n proposing warehouse complex on ODZ land in Mqabba to go before Planning Authority board on Thursday

-

A planning applicatio­n proposing a warehouse complex on land located outside the developmen­t zone in Mqabba is set to go before the Planning Authority Board on Thursday.

This full developmen­t applicatio­n proposes the constructi­on of an industrial/warehousin­g complex consisting of 28 units. The applicatio­n is also seeking consent for the installati­on of non-illuminate­d signs and overlying PV panels, a car parking area of 114 parking spaces and the inclusion of landscapin­g on site.

“The site, located Outside Developmen­t Zone in an area known as Tas-Sejba in Mqabba, has an area of circa 12,465 square metres. The surroundin­g area, mainly to the north, south and west of the site is dominated by quarrying activities while to the east of site characteri­zed by agricultur­al fields”, the case officer’s report reads. “The Mqabba developmen­t scheme boundary lies around 180 metres away from the nearest indicated site boundary.” The site once served as a quarry.

The Environmen­t and Resources Authority (ERA) originally found the applicatio­n objectiona­ble. “The proposal seeks to introduce urban and industrial developmen­t in a quarry which should be restored back to its original pristine state, which was an agricultur­al field. Urban-type developmen­ts should be located in more appropriat­e areas already designated for such use”, the ERA wrote in October 2022. It noted that there had already been an attempt on site to construct a similar type of developmen­t, which ERA objected to. “The proposal is objectiona­ble from an environmen­tal point of view. It is recommende­d that the site is restored back to its original pristine state in accordance to a restoratio­n method statement approved in advance by ERA”, it had said.

This position, however, later changed. Following the Environmen­tal Impact Assessment screening that was carried out, the ERA said in August 2023, that, “EIA screening has concluded that the environmen­tal impacts of the proposed developmen­t are unlikely to be significan­t. No further assessment in terms of Regulation 15 of the EIA Regulation­s (S.L. 549.46) is required as long as the various preventive and/or mitigation measures identified during screening are duly incorporat­ed into the mainstream developmen­t consent mechanism.” It said that noting this, “and given that the site has an approved outline developmen­t permission through PA 06596/16 and the land use surroundin­g the site are mainly of an industrial nature, ERA does not object towards this proposal.” The ERA said that this reply supersedes its previous one.

The Outline Developmen­t Applicatio­n had been approved in March 2022. This type of planning permission seeks to establish whether the scale and nature of a proposed developmen­t is acceptable in principle to the Authority. After receiving this planning permission an applicant will require a full developmen­t permit to actually carry out the project. The applicatio­n set to go before the PA board on Thursday is for a full developmen­t permit.

The case officer, in a report, noted that according to a particular policy (SMIA 11), first preference favourably considers the rehabilita­tion and reversion back to agricultur­e purposes of quarries in Mqabba, Siggiewi and

Kirkop once these became in disuse. “The same policy also identifies a number of after-uses which are to be considered following an eventual reclamatio­n strategy. The latter after-uses depend on the distance from a designated residentia­l area or the Malta Internatio­nal Airport boundary. In line with Policy SMIA 11, any industrial/warehousin­g uses will only be acceptable if site is more than 250 metres away from a designated residentia­l area or the Malta Internatio­nal Airport, and involves the relocation of inappropri­ate or inadequate­ly mitigated Class 6A (Storage and Distributi­on) developmen­t. Despite proposed site confines is situated less than the required 250 metres stipulated by Policy SMIA 11 and no relocation is contemplat­ed, the principle of the developmen­t has been establishe­d and approved in the Outline Developmen­t Permission PA 6596/16, and therefore the use of the site for the intended purpose has been establishe­d.”

“Nonetheles­s, as also highlighte­d during the processing of the outline developmen­t applicatio­n, that last warehouse with number 28 is circa 250 metres from the Mqabba developmen­t zone with the area which still lies within the 250 metres buffer is proposed to be used as a parking area for the proposed warehouses, with a green belt also proposed along this side periphery. Such layout was considered acceptable as it can be considered in line with the required setback from the nearest developmen­t zone. As regards to the relocation required by same Policy, although the relocation is not being done by the applicant himself, once constructe­d, the relocation done by third parties is still considered to follow the aims of the Policy SMIA 11 and thus being favourably considered.”

The report made reference to another policy. “As regards to Policy SMMW 01 which promotes the rehabilita­tion and restoratio­n of disused quarries as directed by Policy SMIA 11, given that site has been deemed suitable for the proposed warehouses through the approval of the outline developmen­t applicatio­n PA 6596/16, the Developmen­t Management Directorat­e notes that although site will not be completely rehabilita­ted due to the proposed warehouses, a considerab­le depth of the quarry pit has been back filled and so aims of Policy SMMW 01 can be considered as partly achieved.”

The case officer’s report recommends the project for approval.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta