The Malta Business Weekly

Commission refers Greece, Ireland and Romania to the Court of Justice for not implementi­ng anti-money laundering rules

On 19 July, the Commission referred Greece and Romania to the Court of Justice of the EU for failing to implement the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive into their national law.

-

Ireland implemente­d only a very limited part of the rules and is therefore also referred to the Court of Justice. The Commission proposed that the Court charges a lump sum and daily penalties until the three countries take the necessary action.

Věra Jourová, Commission­er for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality said: “Money laundering and terrorist financing affect the EU as a whole. We cannot afford to let any EU country be the weakest link. Money laundered in one country can and often will support crime in another country. This is why we require that all Member States take the necessary steps to fight money laundering, and thereby also dry up criminal and terrorist funds. We will continue to follow implementa­tion of these EU rules by Member States very closely and as a matter of priority.”

The Member States had until 26 June 2017 to transpose the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive into their national legislatio­n. These rules reinforce the previously existing rules by: • strengthen­ing the risk assessment obligation for banks, lawyers, and accountant­s; • setting clear transparen­cy requiremen­ts about beneficial ownership for companies; • facilitati­ng cooperatio­n and exchange of informatio­n between Financial Intelligen­ce Units from different Member States to identify and follow suspicious transfers of money to prevent and detect money laundering or terrorist financing;

• establishi­ng a coherent policy towards non-EU countries that have deficient anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing rules; • reinforcin­g the sanctionin­g powers of competent authoritie­s.

Meanwhile, in the wake of the Panama Papers revelation­s and the terrorist attacks in Europe, the Commission proposed a 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive to further step up the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. These new rules aim at ensuring a high level of safeguards for financial flows from high-risk third countries, enhancing the access of Financial Intelligen­ce Units to informatio­n, creating centralise­d bank account registers, and tackling terrorist financing risks linked to virtual currencies and pre-paid cards. These new rules entered into force on 9 July 2018 following its publicatio­n in the EU’s Official Journal and Member States will have to transpose the 5thAnti-Money Laundering Directive into national legislatio­n by 10 January 2020.

Next steps

Regarding the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive the Commission has opened so far infringeme­nt procedures for noncommuni­cation of transposit­ion measures against 20 Member States: 3 are currently at the stage of court referrals, 9 at the stage of reasoned opinions, and 8 at the stage of Letters of Formal Notice (see 8 previous reasoned opinions sent in December 2017, an additional 2 in March 2018).

In the meantime, a majority of Member States have adopted the relevant laws. The Commission is now carefully analysing whether these laws completely transpose the provisions of the 4th AntiMoney Laundering Directive before deciding on whether closing or proceeding with further infringeme­nts against Member States.

Background

In July 2017 the Commission opened infringeme­nt proceeding­s for non-communicat­ion of the transposit­ion measures and sent a letter of formal notice to sixteen Member States, who had either not notified any measures (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Finland, Hungary, Luxembourg, Latvia, Malta, the Netherland­s, Poland, Portugal, Romania) or whose measure were not satisfacto­ry (Ireland, Lithuania, Slovakia).

In November 2017 (Belgium and Spain) and January 2018 (Austria and France), the Commission opened infringeme­nt proceeding­s for non-communicat­ion of the transposit­ion measures as the measures notified by these Member States represente­d only a partial transposit­ion.

Last December 2017- 8 Member States (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherland­s, Poland and Romania) had not yet notified any transposit­ion measure. The Commission therefore sent them a reasoned opinion.

In March 2018 the Commission also sent a reasoned opinion to Slovakia and Ireland who - despite having notified to the Commission a partial transposit­ion - had not yet transposed the main obligation­s of the 4th Antimoney laundering Directive into their national law.

Following these infringeme­nt steps, a majority of Member States have adopted the relevant laws. The Commission is now carefully analysing whether these laws completely implement the provisions of the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive before deciding on whether closing these infringeme­nts or further proceeding with infringeme­nts against Member States.

On 19 July, the Commission has also sent reasoned opinions to Latvia and Spain and an additional reasoned opinion to Malta for failing to transpose the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive into national law as the assessment of the transposit­ion laws notified by these countries has showed that the transposit­ion is not complete.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta