The Malta Business Weekly

Using Cloud in the GDPR Era

For many organisati­ons, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation requires a new level of data governance. Cloud storage can make that trickier.

-

In industries such as health care and financial services, regulatory requiremen­ts have long shaped companies’ use of the cloud. Today, any organisati­on with data on residents of the European Union faces similar constraint­s thanks to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which took effect in May. GDPR places tight restrictio­ns on the handling of personal data from the EU, and it can have a significan­t effect on many organisati­ons’ cloud efforts.

Designed to harmonise data privacy and data protection across Europe, GDPR holds accountabl­e all companies that process personal data associated with EU residents, whether customers, employees, or others. Regardless of where the companies themselves are located, they must now handle data about EU-based individual­s according to very specific rules. Those that fail to do so could face potential penalties as high as 4 percent of global revenue or 20 million euros.

GDPR’s requiremen­ts affect what data is housed and where, how it is secured, and how it is accessed and used. As enterprise­s embrace public clouds and store data in increasing­ly diverse environmen­ts, it’s critical they understand the regulatory and legal considerat­ions.

The Buck Stops Here

Among the challenges now facing organisati­ons as a result of GDPR is the need to identify, inventory, and maintain a record of all the EU-based personal data they collect and process. They must also incorporat­e privacy and data protection controls into any systems or processes that involve such data. And when EU residents ask to access their data or have it corrected, erased, or moved, organisati­ons must be willing and able to comply.

‘Rather than waiting for an official audit by regulators, leading organisati­ons are beginning to conduct self-audits of their own compliance.’

These requiremen­ts demand a level of data governance far beyond what most organisati­ons have had traditiona­lly, even in their own data centres; when the data resides in the cloud, the challenge becomes even more complex.

Although cloud storage takes an organisati­on’s data off-site, GDPR compliance remains the responsibi­lity of the organisati­on that owns the data—not the cloud provider. Think of the cloud as a storage locker: You get the keys, and you’re responsibl­e for what’s inside—even if it’s not on your premises.

Complicati­ng matters further is that regulators will likely perform audits to ensure compliance, and when data is in the cloud, they may seek physical access to the data centres involved. That’s not something cloud providers are accustomed to providing. While they certainly know this possibilit­y is coming, it’s not yet clear how their interpreta­tion of what’s required will mesh with regulators’ expectatio­ns.

Leading Practices

It will take some time for many of the rules to become more clearly delineated. In the meantime, some companies may avoid doing business in Europe altogether, at least until the dust settles; others may turn away from the cloud because they feel less in control of their infrastruc­ture. For everyone else, a few leading practices can help:

Take control.

First and foremost, it is important for organisati­ons to do as much as possible to retain control of their own compliance by making sure they understand the regulation and proactivel­y figuring out how they need to change—and how to do it most effectivel­y. Otherwise, regulators will most likely drive that change through audits and penalties, and their priorities will almost certainly be different.

Weigh the costs.

For some organisati­ons, GDPR compliance may be more expensive when data is in the cloud than when it’s in their own data centres because of the extra steps that may be required for monitoring and control. It’s important to break down the costs for each option and understand how they compare—then make infrastruc­ture decisions from there.

Establish key roles.

Much the way health care organisati­ons have created new roles within the organisati­on to manage HIPAA compliance, so GDPR calls for something similar. A data controller, for instance, typically defines what personally identifiab­le informatio­n the organisati­on processes, and for what purpose; essentiall­y, this is the person who identifies the data covered by the regulation. The data processor, meanwhile, maintains and oversees the processing of the data and can be held liable for breaches. Finally, the data protection officer, or DPO, is the person responsibl­e for educating the company and serving as the chief contact point for regulators.

Perform self-audits.

Rather than waiting for an official audit by regulators, leading organisati­ons are beginning to conduct selfaudits of their own compliance. Outside consultant­s can play a key role here by performing mock audits that simulate real ones, helping organisati­ons see where their vulnerabil­ities lie, whether internally, in the public cloud, or with other business partners.

Don’t freeze up.

Last but not least, it’s important not to let GDPR stifle innovation or freeze the organisati­on in place. To stay competitiv­e, companies need to maintain their creativity and keep innovating, and to design their systems accordingl­y. In many cases, the cloud can and should remain a part of that picture.

***

There’s no doubt GDPR has launched a new era in data management, and cloud storage can add yet another level of complexity to the already daunting compliance challenge. With the right approach, however, the cloud’s many potential benefits can make it well worth undertakin­g that extra considerat­ion.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta