The Malta Business Weekly

Proactivel­y managing risk

Risk appetite, culture and responsibi­lity are key in establishi­ng a proactive value-adding risk management function

- ALEX AZZOPARDI GISELLE BORG

At the heart of any entreprene­urial venture is the basic relationsh­ip between risk and reward. And whilst any successful business has at the helm minds which have managed risks, difference­s in the maturity of risk functions across different enterprise­s abound. Although the more risk-mature models manage risks efficientl­y and effectivel­y, we believe that today’s organisati­ons need to re-imagine risk management so that it becomes a value creator in its own right.

The risk landscape that faces our businesses is indeed a rich one. Key risk areas include cybersecur­ity, sustainabl­e finance, regulation, people, operationa­l resilience, fraud & financial crime, third party management to name but a few of the risks that are currently consuming most of the Three Lines of Defence’s bandwidth within organisati­ons. Added to these, we cannot neglect risk areas which have been there for years and continue to require attention: credit, liquidity, corporate governance.

Today’s chief risk officer has to keep tabs with a growing list of risks: some of which will be increasing in importance, others which are more stable and others yet that are becoming less relevant with the passage of time. And whilst the ‘back-of-the-envelope’ risk list set out above will apply to different sectors in varying ways, the implicatio­n is inevitable – the risk function has a crucial role in helping the business navigate through its risks.

In all this, risk management is typically structural­ly separated from frontline decision-making. Often risk functions are reactive and deemed by business decision makers as those that “put the breaks” on business. Whilst some organisati­ons manage to bridge this divide when making the initial investment decisions, fewer manage to keep this strong partnershi­p bond between First and Second Line for ongoing risk (and compliance) processes. This is certainly not the optimal use of the resources employed to manage risks. It is time to unlock the potential there is hidden within risk functions.

The greatest value to be obtained from the Risk Function is when there is the belief that the game is one of opportunit­y rather than of risk, one of proactiven­ess rather than reactivene­ss. Seizing opportunit­y means that each risk decision becomes a means not only to achieve business growth but also to become more trusted by the external stakeholde­rs. An ‘offensive’ stance is where you spot potential risks early, making good strategic decisions through insights gained from useful and relevant data.

To achieve this change in risk management requires that the enterprise takes the right steps in relation to Risk Appetite, Risk Culture and Risk Responsibi­lity.

Risk Appetite needs to be set from the top and translated into an enterprise­wide risk strategy and risk management framework. It also needs to be firmly, unequivoca­lly and consistent­ly communicat­ed through all levels of the organisati­on, including the Board. This communicat­ion can take various forms from printed/online messaging, to informatio­n sessions and to the continuous alignment of remunerati­on, incentives and KPIs with this appetite to ensure that appropriat­e behaviour is re-enforced. Despite pressures to do so, organisati­ons cannot fall into the trap of reaching short-term goals without considerin­g the long-term ones.

Achieving the right Risk Culture is also key to enabling risk management in providing greater value. Risk Culture within enterprise­s has a habit of swinging from one extreme to the other. And at present, with the greater scrutiny of external stakeholde­rs, risk functions (and the workforce in general) have a tendency to be very risk averse. We should, rather, aim to make the organisati­on ‘risk aware’: fully knowledgea­ble of the entity’s risk appetite, the business should be in the hands of people who are fully aware of the risks and parameters in which to operate and seize opportunit­ies.

This leads to the reversal of the siloed manner in which the business functions often operate from the risk and compliance functions. Managing risk should certainly not be the responsibi­lity of the Second Line only – it is the responsibi­lity of everyone within the organisati­on. From their end, Second Line functions must continue fostering a valued business partnershi­p with the First Line, by keeping business goals central in the day-to-day execution of their work.

The change in mentality to proactivel­y manage risks requires a transforma­tion which will launch the risk management approach that your organisati­on needs to have in place. KPMG’s reference model of the risk function is built upon a number of components covering:

• the overarchin­g elements of Strategy, Vision and Risk Management framework;

• the function’s organisati­onal framework;

• operationa­l, day-to-day elements of the function; and,

• performanc­e monitoring in place for the function.

Data and technology underpin the success of this transforma­tion. Significan­t data is created within organisati­ons – but without proper tools, leveraging data becomes impossible. The right technology allows for the organisati­on and analysis of such data, whilst ensuring that data quality is kept high. When one platform allows different parts of the entity access to such data, further alignment of the different parts of the business is achieved. One such applicatio­n is KPMG’s Risk Hub, a managed service developed through a global alliance with IBM. Risk Hub is particular­ly powerful in that it integrates informatio­n and data across all levels of the business and brings to the users a holistic view of risks. Risk Hub avails of Artificial Intelligen­ce capabiliti­es to achieve ongoing monitoring of the risk profile of an organisati­on, as well as automating a number of processes to free people up to focus on higher-value tasks.

Achieving this transforma­tion will not take place overnight. It needs a clearly designed path, proportion­ate investment and ongoing monitoring. It is, however, the path that leads to a return to the resources employed in a risk function as it allows for identifyin­g and capturing opportunit­ies.

Alex Azzopardi is Director, Risk Consulting Advisory Services, KPMG in Malta and Giselle Borg is Director, Insurance Advisory Services, KPMG

in Malta

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malta