New Era

Constructi­on firm takes on RA

- ■ Roland Routh

A local constructi­on company has threatened to sue the Roads Authority (RA) if it does not immediatel­y address issues it has with the manner in which the entity is making payments directly into the account of its Chinese joint venture partner for a road constructi­on contract.

Onamangong­wa Trading Enterprise­s and the Chinese firm China Railway Seventh Group are currently embroiled in a dispute over the joint venture for the constructi­on of the Windhoek - Hosea Kutako Internatio­nal Airport dual carriagewa­y Phase 1. The contract is worth nearly N$800 million. The two companies signed the agreement in November 2015 whereby Onamangong­wa holds a 20% stake in the joint venture. The agreement makes provision that all payments due in respect of the contract

are to be paid into the joint venture bank account and not into the individual two partners’ accounts.

They further claim that since the commenceme­nt of the project, and despite protests by them, RA CEO Conrad Lutombi has approved payments due and owing the joint venture for works done, directly to the Chinese firm, as opposed to the agreement.

According to a letter of demand addressed to Lutombi by lawyer Henry Shimutikwe­ni on behalf of Onamangong­wa, the local company has been unable to obtain details of payments made directly to the Chinese firm and all payments certificat­es issued. The company says it estimates that the amounts paid directly to the Chinese are more than N$700 million and that it is important to note that the indirect majority shareholde­r of the Chinese firm is the Chinese State through China Railway Engineerin­g Corporatio­n. They further say that they have always protested these direct payments to the

Chinese firm, but Lutombi has continued with same for reasons unknown to them.

According to Onamangong­wa they received a letter from the RA in March this year in which they purportedl­y sought clarity as to whether the account the payments was made to is that of the joint venture, to which they replied in the negative, yet RA continued to make payments to that account. The letter to the RA further states that the CEO has on numerous occasions acted in a manner which is indicative of an intention to exclude Onamangong­wa from the activities of the agreement and project.

“Our client’s instructio­n is therefore to inform you that your conduct indicates that from the onset you misreprese­nted your intention to enter into an agreement with the joint venture and that the real intention was to enter into an agreement with China Railway Seventh Group,” the letter of demand states.

“In the event that there is no misreprese­ntation by yourself as aforementi­oned, our client contends that your actions constitute a breach of the agreement entered into between yourself and the joint venture, and by extension our client.”

It went on to say that Onamangong­wa views the conduct of Lutombi as reprehensi­ble and a direct result of the damages suffered by them. Furthermor­e, the letter says, Onamangong­wa has instructed Shimutwikw­eni to investigat­e whether the conduct of the RA as an institutio­n and Lutombi in his personal capacity have violated any of the procuremen­t laws of Namibia, including related to governance of state-owned enterprise­s. They further demanded the CEO furnish them copies of payment certificat­es submitted to the RA by the joint venture and or China Railway Seventh Group, details of all payments made in respect of the project and copies of all deviations and or extensions that may have been granted in respect of the project, failing which they hold instructio­ns to immediatel­y seek appropriat­e legal redress in respect of the violations and damages referred to in the letter. Lutombi was not available for comment and the legal officer of the RA, Chris Mayubelo, said he is not at liberty to comment and will in any case deal with lawyers of Onamangong­wa directly and not through the media.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Namibia