New Era

Tourism businesses appeal for Covid test rule change

- Albertina Nakale – anakale@nepc.com.na

The Hospitalit­y Associatio­n of Namibia (HAN) and the Tour and Safari Associatio­n of Namibia as well as some key tourism service providers last week jointly drafted an appeal for the review of the wording in the current gazette regarding the 72 hour ruling on valid PCR tests necessary to enter Namibia.

As per the current Public Health Regulation­s, which came into force on 15 August 2021 and are effective until 15 September 2021, persons permitted to enter Namibia under sub-regulation (2) may not enter Namibia unless such persons, at the time of entering Namibia, present to an authorised SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result from the country of departure.

Such test results should not be older than 72 hours, calculated from the date the sample for testing was taken and issued by a certified laboratory to issue SARSCoV-2 PCR test results.

“But a change in the wording of one regulation is stifling long-haul travel, thus creating enormous losses in the tourism industry to the nation’s economy and cost thousands of Namibians their jobs,” HAN chief executive officer Gitta Paetzold reasoned.

She said their joint letter was delivered to the environmen­t and tourism ministry, who indicated in their ongoing support for the Tourism Revival Initiative to urgently engage with their counterpar­ts at the health as well as home affairs and immigratio­n ministries.

Other partners who signed the letter include Natural Selection managing director Ally Karaerua, Africa Tourist Info managing director David Cartwright, Gondwana Collection CEO Gys Joubert, Wilderness Safaris business unit manager Nathaly Ahrens, Ongava Game Reserve sales and marketing general manager Rob Moffett as well as Ultimate Safaris managing director Tristan Cowley.

The partners contend the potential loss to Namibia is quantifiab­le.

“If the current wording were to remain in place, it would result in 60% cancellati­on of bookings, held by long-haul travellers. This can be extrapolat­ed to 30 or 40 businesses across Namibia in both rural and urban areas. Over a year, this would result in the loss of N$20 million bookings. Crude extrapolat­ion across 40 businesses is up to N$800m direct loss, and 3 000 citizens stand to lose their jobs.”

Paetzold said the letter is selfexplan­atory and provides some crucial facts that if considered and applied correctly could save thousands of jobs in tourism and help salvage efforts for tourism recovery in Namibia – which, unfortunat­ely, under the current circumstan­ces, looks bleak.

By yesterday, Peatzold said they have not yet received an official response but a firm indication from the environmen­t minister Pohamba Shifeta that he would raise it with his health and immigratio­n counterpar­ts.

Tourism players have requested the public health regulation­s to be amended to the original wording of not older than 72 hours up to the time of the first embarkatio­n.

They argue this is in line with the Internatio­nal Air Transport Associatio­n (IATA) standard wording from ‘the first embarkatio­n’. Further, they are convinced this will make it possible geographic­ally for visitors from high-value source markets across time zones, including Far East Asia (Hong Kong, Singapore and China) and North America to reach Namibia.

“We kindly request the authoritie­s to amend the regulation to its original wording of 72 hours up to the time of the first embarkatio­n. This will harmonise Namibia’s regulation­s with South Africa, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Kenya and many other countries. This change will help to keep businesses open. It will save Namibian jobs, and it will help to ensure that the tourism industry – Namibia’s 3rd largest industry prior to the pandemic – survives.

Moreover, the tourism players argue Namibia’s peer group wording of PCR testing requiremen­t demonstrat­es clearly that countries with significan­t high-end tourism attraction – specifical­ly South Africa, Kenya, Mauritius, Rwanda, Seychelles, Zambia and Zimbabwe – will benefit directly from the cancellati­ons and lost bookings that the wording of Namibia’s regulation­s restricts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Namibia