Bay of Plenty Times

China condemns ‘foreign meddling’ in Hong Kong

-

China’s government and pro-beijing activists in Hong Kong condemned what they called foreign meddling in the territory’s affairs yesterday, as countries moved to offer Hong Kongers refuge and impose sanctions on China over a new security law.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said no amount of pressure could “shake China’s determinat­ion and will to safeguard national sovereignt­y and Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability”.

He urged the US to abide by internatio­nal law and stop interferin­g in Hong Kong’s affairs, and not sign a sanction bill into law.

His comments came after the US House of Representa­tives joined the Senate in approving a bill to rebuke China over its crackdown in Hong Kong by imposing sanctions on groups that undermine the city’s autonomy or restrict freedoms promised to its residents.

If the bill becomes law, “China will definitely take strong countermea­sures, and all consequenc­es will be borne by the US side”, Zhao said at a daily briefing.

Vice President Mike Pence in a television interview yesterday called the law a betrayal of the internatio­nal agreement China signed.

“President Trump has made it clear that we’re going to be modifying our trading relationsh­ip and the trading status with regard to Hong Kong and we’re going to continue to speak out on behalf of the people of Hong Kong and on behalf of human rights of people within China.”

Meanwhile, dozens of pro-beijing activists and lawmakers protested outside the US Consulate in Hong Kong to demand that the US stop meddling. The group said it gathered 1.6 million signatures online in support of its call.

Tam Yiu-chung, Hong Kong’s sole delegate to the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, said on public broadcaste­r RTHK yesterday that the new security law imposed by Beijing on Hong Kong was not harsh. If it were, no one would dare violate the law, he said.

His comments came a day after thousands of protesters marched against the security law, which took effect in Hong Kong on Wednesday.

The security law outlaws secessioni­st, subversive and terrorist acts, as well as any collusion with foreign forces in intervenin­g in the city’s affairs. Critics say the law effectivel­y ends the “one country, two systems” framework under which the city was promised a high degree of autonomy when it reverted from British to Chinese rule in 1997.

The maximum punishment for serious offences under the legislatio­n is life imprisonme­nt, and suspects in certain cases may be sent to stand trial on the mainland if Beijing deems that it has jurisdicti­on.

The law takes aim at actions that occurred during anti-government protests last year. It says destructio­n of government facilities and utilities would be considered subversive, while damaging public transporta­tion facilities and arson would constitute acts of terrorism. About 370 people were arrested during and after Thursday’s protests, including 10 on suspicion of violating the new security law. Some of those arrested allegedly possessed materials advocating Hong Kong’s independen­ce.

The central government’s passage of the security law for Hong Kong has triggered concern from the territory’s former colonial ruler, Britain, and other countries.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said that imposition of the law was a “clear and serious breach” of the Sino-british Joint Declaratio­n, the treaty that guaranteed the former British colony would enjoy a high degree of autonomy and civil liberties for at least 50 years after its handover to Chinese rule.

Britain also announced that it is extending residency rights for up to 3 million Hong Kongers eligible for British National Overseas passports, stressing that it would uphold its historic duty to its former colony. Those eligible will be able to live and work in the UK for five years before applying for settled status and then again for citizenshi­p.

Yesterday, the Chinese Embassy in London said such a move would be in breach of “internatio­nal law and basic norms governing internatio­nal relations.”

“We firmly oppose this and reserve the right to take correspond­ing measures,” it said in a statement, without elaboratin­g. AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand