Traditional manufacturers put on notice
Three-D printing, or additive manufacturing,has as come a long way from its roots in the production of simple plastic prototypes. Today, 3D printers can not only handle materials ranging from titanium to human cartilage, but also produce fully functional components, including complex mechanisms, batteries, transistors, and LEDs.
The capabilities of 3D printing hardware are evolving rapidly, too. They can build larger components and achieve greater precision, and finer resolution at higher speeds, and lower costs.
Together, these advances have brought the technology to a tipping point – it appears ready to emerge from its niche status and become a viable alternative to conventional manufacturing processes in an increasing number of applications.
Should this happen, the technology would transform manufacturing flexibility – for example, by allowing companies to slash development time, eliminate tooling costs, and simplify production runs – while making it possible to create complex shapes and structures that weren’t feasible before. Moreover, additive manufacturing would help companies improve the productivity of materials by eliminating the waste that accrues in traditional (subtractive) manufacturing, and would spur the formation of a beneficial circular economy. The economic implications of 3D printing are significant: McKinsey Global Institute research suggests it could have an impact of up to US$550 billion a year by 2025.
The advantages of 3D printing over other manufacturing technologies could lead to profound changes in the way many things are designed, developed, produced, and supported. Here are five 3D printing disruptions that senior executives should begin preparing for.
Product development cycles
Reducing time in product development was a key benefit of the first 3D printing machines, which were designed to speed the creation of product prototypes (and in some cases helped reduce turnaround times to a matter of hours, from days or weeks). Now many industries are poised for a second wave of acceleration as the line between additive and conventional manufacturing blurs.
For example, additive manufacturing is already being used to get prototypes into the hands of customers faster. The ability to make prototypes without tooling let’s companies quickly test multiple configurations to determine customer preferences, reducing product-launch risk and time to market.
Companies could even go into production using 3D printed parts and start selling products while the traditional production tools were still being manufactured, or before the decision to produce them had been made. When companies did order those tools, they could use additive-manufacturing techniques to make them, saving even more time and money.
We expect these techniques will contribute to significant reductions in product-development cycle times over the next decade. (For example, 3D printing makes some aspects of day-to-day R&D work, such as producing simple lab apparatus, vastly more productive.)
Over time, 3D printing will begin to affect how companies think about R&D more broadly, given how the technology enhances the ability to crowdsource ideas through remote cooperation. For some companies, that crowdsourced brainpower might one day begin supplanting R&D activities, making its management a new priority.
New manufacturing strategies
As of 2011, only about 25 percent of the additive-manufacturing market involved the direct manufacture of end products. With a 60 percent annual growth rate, however, that is the industry’s fastestgrowing segment.
As costs continue to fall, and the capabilities of 3D printers increase, the range of parts that can be economically manufactured using additive techniques will broaden dramatically. Boeing, for example, already uses printers to make some 200 part numbers for 10 different types of aircraft, and medical-products companies are using them to create hip replacements.
Nonetheless, not every component will be a candidate for the technology and reap its benefits (cost reductions, performance improvements, or both). Companies should understand the characteristics that help determine which ones are. These include components with a high labourcost element (such as time-consuming assembly and secondary machining processes), complex tooling requirements
or relatively low volumes (and thus high tooling costs), or high obsolescence or scrap rates.
Additive-manufacturing techniques also have implications for manufacturingfootprint decisions. While there is still a meaningful labour component to 3D printed parts, the fact that it is lower than that of conventionally manufactured ones might, for example, tip the balance toward production closer to end customers. Alternatively, companies could find that the fully digital nature of 3D printing makes it possible to produce complex parts in remote countries with lower input costs for electricity and labour.
A related area that executives should watch with interest is the development of the market for printing materials. The cost of future materials is uncertain, as today many printers use proprietary ones owned or licensed by the manufacturer of the printing equipment. Should this change and more universal standards develop – thus lowering prices – the implications for executives devising manufacturing strategies and making footprint decisions would become very significant very quickly.
Shifting sources of profit
Additive-manufacturing technologies could alter the way companies add value to their products and services.
The outsourcing of conventional manufacturing helped spur companies such as Nike to rely more on their design skills. Likewise, 3D printing techniques could reduce the cost and complexity of other kinds of production and force companies to differentiate their products in other ways.
These could include everything from making products more easily reparable to creating personalized designs.
Indeed, reducing the reliance on hard tooling creates an opportunity to offer customized or bespoke designs at lower cost – and to a far broader range of customers. The additive manufacture of individualized orthodontic braces is just one example of the potential of these technologies.
The combination of mass customization and new design possibilities will up the ante for many companies and could prove very disruptive to traditional players in some segments.
In certain parts of the value chain, the application of additive manufacturing will be less visible to customers, although its impact may be just as profound. A key challenge in traditional aftermarket supply chains, for example, is managing appropriate inventories of spare parts, particularly for older, legacy products. The ability to manufacture replacement parts on demand using 3D printers could transform the economics of aftermarket service and the structure of industries.
Relatively small facilities with on-site additive manufacturing capabilities could replace large regional warehouses. The supply of service parts might even be outsourced: small fabricators (or
Moreover, the availability of open-source designs for 3D printed firearms shows how such technologies have the potential to create ethical and regulatory dilemmas and to disrupt industries.
fabs) located, for example, at airports, hospitals, or major manufacturing venues could make these parts for much of the equipment used on site, with data supplied directly by the manufacturers.
Design is inherently linked to methods of fabrication. Engineers can’t design machines without considering the benefits and limitations of casting, forging, milling, turning, and welding.
While there is a wealth of knowledge around design for manufacturing, much less is available on design for printing. Our conversations with executives at manufacturing companies suggest that many are aware of this gap and scrambling to catalogue their design know-how.
Getting the most out of additivemanufacturing techniques also involves technical challenges, which include setting environmental parameters to prevent shape distortion, optimizing the speed of printing, and adjusting the properties of novel materials. Indeed, tuning materials is quite a challenge. While plastics are relatively straightforward to work with, metals are more difficult.
The most successful players will understand these challenges. Some are already creating centres of excellence and hiring engineers with strong experience in additive manufacturing.
Many benefits of 3D printing could cut the cost of market entry for new players: for example, the use of the technology to lower tooling costs makes it cheaper to begin manufacturing, even at low volumes, or to serve niche segments.
The direct manufacturing of end products greatly simplifies and reduces the work of a designer who would only have to take products from the computer screen to commercial viability. New businesses are already popping up to offer highly customized or collaboratively designed products.
Initially, these new competitors will be niche players, operating where consumers are willing to pay a premium for a bespoke design, complex geometry, or rapid delivery.
Over the longer term, however, they could transform industries in unexpected ways, moving the source of competitive advantage away from the ability to manufacture in high volumes at low cost and toward other areas of the value chain, such as design or even the ownership of customer networks.
Moreover, the availability of opensource designs for 3D printed firearms shows how such technologies have the potential to create ethical and regulatory dilemmas and to disrupt industries.
The authors would like to thank Michael Chui and Markus Hammer for their contributions to this article. This article was originally published in McKinsey Quarterly, www. mckinsey.com/insights/mckinsey_quarterly. Copyright (c) 2014 McKinsey & Company. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.