Herald on Sunday

UK giants back ‘Crater’

Olympics builders keen to work on ‘iconic’ Auckland stadium plan.

- By Simon Plumb

The engineerin­g firm behind London’s Olympic Stadium and home grounds of Premier League giants Manchester City, Arsenal and Tottenham Hotspur wants in on Auckland’s submerged stadium concept.

World-leading consultanc­y BuroHappol­d Engineerin­g has contacted Kiwi designer Phil O’Reilly about his stunning plans revealed by the Herald on Sunday last week for a coliseum-style sunken arena either on the waterfront or former railway land nearby.

The UK-based company, which has one of the world’s most impressive constructi­on portfolios, now wants to engage Auckland Council, local sport clubs like the Warriors and other stakeholde­rs to help solve the city’s stadium dilemma by creating something “unique and iconic”.

A partner at BuroHappol­d Engineerin­g, Matthew Birchall, said O’Reilly’s out-of-the-box concept had huge potential and his firm wanted to help unlock a new developmen­t in Auckland.

“It is highly unusual and we are always interested in bespoke iconic stadia,” Birchall said from England.

“There is a real potential with this solution to create a modern coliseum of sport and entertainm­ent that would enable a unique experience for the spectators and players alike.

“We would love to work with the stakeholde­rs in Auckland. The city’s and the profession­al sports clubs’ needs could work very well together — creating an active and iconic venue that inspires a generation.”

O’Reilly’s artistic impression­s, revealed last week, focused on a waterfront location, though he said the same concept could be transplant­ed to solid ground.

Engineerin­g expert Birchall said creating a safe waterfront concept would be absolutely possible — but expensive.

However, he also said the cost of executing the same concept on land would be far less expensive than building a traditiona­l stadium above ground — making “The Crater” a solid contender should Auckland Council decide to go for a new start.

“If you were to build a venue like that, not in the water but on land, and it didn’t have a roof on it, like an openair coliseum. You could probably do for £3000-£5000 per seat ($5640-$9400).

“A 50,000-seat stadium, normally, would cost upwards of £5000-£8000 ($9300-$1500) per seat in the UK market.

“Building the crater on land is demonstrab­ly the less expensive way of doing it.”

He said the cheapest option could come in at around $280 million.

Auckland Mayor Phil Goff has said Auckland cannot afford a white elephant, adding the 50,000-seat Eden Park was limited to 21 night events and could need another $250 million spent on it over the next 15 years.

BuroHappol­d Engineerin­g has not been the only party interested in The Crater since last week’s report. Auckland-based engineerin­g consultant­s ENGEO also contacting O’Reilly over his project.

Senior project manager and geotechnic­al engineer, David Brodie, said they “have expressed interest in helping him”.

In March last year, rich-lister and Warriors owner Eric Watson pledged to invest in a new stadium for Downtown Auckland.

Last week Watson welcomed O’Reilly’s crater concept.

 ??  ?? Phil O’Reilly’s vision of a sunken stadium on the Auckland waterfront. Below: the London Olympics stadium.
Phil O’Reilly’s vision of a sunken stadium on the Auckland waterfront. Below: the London Olympics stadium.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand