Herald on Sunday

Trying a new diet? Trust your gut instinct

- Niki Bezzant u@nikibezzan­t What’s your view? letters@hos.co.nz

The paleo diet seems to have fallen out of fashion these days, in favour of the more extreme “keto” — short for ketogenic — diet. Some of those who started as paleo people eating meat, vegetables and sweet potato are now avoiding the sweet potato, loading up on fat and testing their pee every day.

Whether keto is ultimately healthy is a conversati­on for another day. But what keto and paleo dieters alike may want to contemplat­e is that common phenomenon: unintended consequenc­es.

In the early days of the paleo diet, experts sounded a note of caution, not just because the diet seemed to emphasise unhealthy amounts of meat, but also because of what it eliminated: grains, legumes and dairy. The speculatio­n then was that cutting these things out might cause changes — not necessaril­y positive — to the gut flora, which could cause consequenc­es which were at that time not researched or known.

Now it seems we might be getting an inkling of what those consequenc­es are. Researcher­s at

Perth’s Edith Cowan University have just completed the first study of the paleo diet’s impact on gut bacteria, and the outcome was not good for fans of the caveman way.

The researcher­s compared 44 people on the paleo diet with 47 following a traditiona­l Australian diet. They measured the amount of trimethyla­mine-n-oxide in the participan­ts’ blood.

High levels of TMAO, an organic compound produced in the gut, are associated with an increased risk of cardiovasc­ular disease.

They found more than twice the amount of TMAO in the paleo people compared to the regular eaters. They suggest that excluding whole grains — which contain resistant starch and other fermentabl­e fibres known to be good for gut bacteria — might change the bacteria population in a way that enables higher production of TMAO. Potentiall­y larger amounts of meat also creates precursor compounds to TMAO. The research is yet to be published, so no doubt there’s more to learn here. But what it points to is the idea that when we restrict what we eat, it might have effects beyond what we intend. Going on any diet — paleo and keto included — may well cause weight loss, and may also improve some health markers such as blood pressure, cholestero­l levels and blood sugar. They can be healthy ways to eat, especially if people are shifting from a high-processedf­ood diet.

But we don’t always know what the long-term effects are of cutting out whole food groups. And we might not know that for a while. Will the young women avoiding dairy now, for example, have bone-density problems when they’re in their 60s? Will the keto eaters’ kidneys pack up? Will paleo people be dropping like flies from heart disease or bowel cancer?

What we do know about any kind of extreme diet is that they are hard to stick to long term. And that can lead to harmful yo-yo weight loss and regain, which is bad for body and mind. It’s unsexy, but moderation — for a lifetime — has its benefits.

Niki Bezzant is editor-atlarge for Healthy Food Guide www.healthy food.co.nz

 ?? Photo / 123RF ?? We don't know what the long-term effects are of cutting out whole food groups.
Photo / 123RF We don't know what the long-term effects are of cutting out whole food groups.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand