Kapi-Mana News

Employees who lie on their CVs

-

G asks what an employer can do when an employee has lied about their qualificat­ions?

Employers who discover employees have lied on their CV, and wrongfully claimed to have necessary qualificat­ions, have several options available to them. These may include: Cancelling the contract. Dismissing the employee under any 90-day clause.

Dismissing the employee for serious misconduct.

The employer may be able to cancel the employment agreement under the Contractua­l Remedies Act.

If the job was advertised as requiring certain qualificat­ions and the employee has lied about having those, it’s likely the agreement can be cancelled.

An employer may also be able to cancel the agreement if the employment agreement contains a warranty that the employee has the necessary qualificat­ions when in fact they don’t.

If the agreement is validly cancelled, the agreement will no longer bind either side.

However, cancellati­on can be procedural­ly difficult to get right.

The employer must not have ‘‘affirmed’’ the contract after discoverin­g the misreprese­ntation.

The employer must also prove the qualificat­ions were ‘‘ essential’’, or that the lack of qualificat­ions ‘‘ substantia­lly’’ changes things.

If the employee has entered into a valid and binding 90-day trial clause, the employer will be able to dismiss the employer within the 90 days.

The employer would not need to offer the employee opportunit­ies to come up to the required standard, and would not need to prove the representa­tions were essential or substantia­l.

However, employees dismissed under the 90-day clause will still need to be paid for any relevant notice period (if one exists in their agreement).

If the employee is unable to perform the role required, and has lied about his or her qualificat­ions, it is possible this would constitute serious misconduct.

An employer may be able to dismiss an employee for that, particular­ly as lies about qualificat­ions directly undermine the employee’s good faith employment obligation­s.

It would be important to investigat­e the allegation thoroughly, and to follow a clear and fair disciplina­ry procedure, including giving the employee an opportunit­y to respond to the allegation and to be accompanie­d by support person at meetings.

The best protection is prevention.

The risk is lessened if you conduct diligent pre- employment checks of references and qualificat­ions.

Employment agreements should also be carefully drafted to protect the employer against risk.

There are options available to employers placed in this unfortunat­e situation.

However, it is important to seek advice about the situation to ensure your response is appropriat­e.

Column courtesy of Rainey Collins Lawyers, phone 0800 733484. If you have a legal inquiry you would like discussed, email Alan on aknowsley@raineycoll­ins.co.nz.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand