Manawatu Standard

America is fast becoming a ‘stan’

- PAUL KRUGMAN

In 2015 the city of Ashgabat, the capital of Turkmenist­an, was graced with a new public monument: a giant gold-plated sculpture portraying the country’s president on horseback. This may strike you as a bit excessive. But cults of personalit­y are actually the norm in the ‘‘stans’’, the Central Asian countries that emerged after the fall of the Soviet Union, all of which are ruled by strongmen who surround themselves with tiny cliques of wealthy crony capitalist­s.

Americans used to find the antics of these regimes, with their tinpot dictators, funny. But who’s laughing now?

We are, after all, about to hand over power to a man who has spent his whole adult life trying to build a cult of personalit­y around himself; remember, his ‘‘charitable’’ foundation spent a lot of money buying a 6-foot portrait of its founder. Meanwhile, one look at his Twitter account is enough to show that victory has done nothing to slake his thirst for ego gratificat­ion. So we can expect lots of self-aggrandize­ment once he’s in office. I don’t think it will go as far as gold-plated statues, but really, who knows?

Meanwhile, with only a couple of weeks until Inaugurati­on Day, Donald Trump has done nothing substantiv­e to reduce the unpreceden­ted or, as he famously wrote on Twitter, ‘‘unpresiden­ted’’ conflicts of interest created by his business empire. Pretty clearly, he never will.

This means that Trump will be in violation of the spirit, and arguably the letter, of the Constituti­on’s emoluments clause, which bars gifts or profits from foreign leaders, the instant he recites the oath of office. But who’s going to hold him accountabl­e?

And the corruption won’t be limited to the very top: The new administra­tion seems set to bring blatant self-dealing into the centre of our political system. Abraham Lincoln may have led a team of rivals; Donald Trump seems to be assembling a team of cronies, choosing billionair­es with obvious, deep conflicts of interest for many key positions in his administra­tion.

In short, America is rapidly turning into a stan.

I know that many people are still trying to convince themselves that the incoming administra­tion will govern normally, despite the obviously undemocrat­ic instincts of the new commander in chief and the questionab­le legitimacy of the process that brought him to power.

But let’s get real. Everything we know suggests that we’re entering an era of epic corruption and contempt for the rule of law, with no restraint whatsoever.

How could this happen in a nation that has long prided itself as a role model for democracie­s everywhere? In a direct sense, Trump’s elevation was made possible by the FBI’S blatant interventi­on in the election, Russian subversion, and the supine news media that obligingly played up fake scandals while burying real ones on the back pages.

But this debacle didn’t come out of nowhere. We’ve been on the road to stan-ism for a long time: an increasing­ly radical GOP, willing to do anything to gain and hold power, has been underminin­g our political culture for decades.

People tend to forget how much of the 2016 playbook had been used in earlier years. Remember, the Clinton administra­tion was besieged by constant accusation­s of corruption, dutifully hyped as major stories by the news media; not one of these alleged scandals turned out to involve any actual wrongdoing.

People also tend to forget just how bad the administra­tion of George W. Bush really was, and not just because it led America to war on false pretenses. There was also an upsurge in cronyism, with many key posts going to people with dubious qualificat­ions but close political and/or business ties to top officials.

The only question now is whether the rot has gone so deep that nothing can stop America’s transforma­tion into Trumpistan. One thing is for sure: It’s destructiv­e as well as foolish to ignore the uncomforta­ble risk, and simply assume that it will all be OK. It won’t.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand