Manawatu Standard

Chuck Berry a flawed man, but a marvellous musician

- RICHARD SWAINSON

Despite the racism, the credit-stealing, the multiple stints in jail, financial challenges and some unsavoury rumours about his sexual procliviti­es, Berry persevered, even touring when well into his 80s.

Chuck Berry died this week in his 91st year. Respectful obituaries, mostly I suspect pre-written, were published the world over. Tributes were sought from those whom he influenced or maybe just wellworn quotations dusted off.

Berry always enjoyed the admiration of his peers.

On the Million Dollar Quartet recordings you can hear Elvis, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis wax lyrical about their great contempora­ry.

John Lennon famously said, ‘‘if you tried to give rock’n’roll another name, you might call it Chuck Berry’’.

Bob Dylan called Berry ‘‘the Shakespear­e of rock’n’roll’’. High praise indeed from a Nobel laureate.

The impact of Berry’s death on the wider culture has been far more muted. Consider the outpouring­s last year when David Bowie, then Prince died. A nonagenari­an does not attract that kind of grief or attention, if only because of evident longevity.

Not the least of Berry’s achievemen­ts was survival. Not for him the early checkouts of Hank Williams or Buddy Holly. Nor did he succumb to middle-age excess like Elvis or Roy Orbison.

Despite the racism, the creditstea­ling, the multiple stints in jail, financial challenges and some unsavoury rumours about his sexual procliviti­es, Berry persevered, even touring when well into his 80s.

There was a contradict­ion between Berry the artist and Berry the man. On stage the former was charm itself, albeit with an understate­d sexuality that got more overt with the passing years.

Berry was a storytelle­r and a poet, his witty narratives concerned with the minutia of teenage life in the 1950s and early 1960s: high school, sex, young love, fast cars and, above all, the new music itself.

When his 60th birthday approached and acolyte Keith Richards sought to celebrate with a special, star-studded gig, the name given to the film which documented the occasion was Chuck Berry Hail! Hail! Rock’n’roll. The latter part of this title appropriat­ed a line from the last, climactic verse of Berry’s classic song School Days: ‘‘Hail, hail, rock’n’roll/deliver me from the days of old/long live rock’n’roll/the beat of the drum is loud and bold/rock rock rock’n’roll/the feelin’ is there body and soul’’.

Even without accompanyi­ng context or the benefit of Berry’s beautifull­y modulated voice, the verse is a statement on the liberating possibilit­ies of the genre, an antidote not only to strictures of the classroom but all the dull, conservati­ve attitudes of ‘‘the days of old’’.

When you listen with the addition of Berry’s trademark, ground-breaking guitar work, the complete sound comes close to a declaratio­n of war.

Not that the musician himself would necessaril­y see it that way. Like most popular American artists, Berry claimed to be disinteres­ted in messages, politics or art itself.

Writing about everyday teenage life was a means to a fiscal end.

Berry had more reason to complain about his country than most yet was capable of writing a celebrator­y piece of pop nationalis­m like Back in the USA, with its concluding refrain ‘‘Anything you want we got it right here in the USA’’.

Among those things that failed to get a mention in the song were segregatio­n, disc jockeys who claimed to co-write your music on the strength of playing it once or twice on the radio and judges who persisted in calling you ‘‘nigra’’ from the bench.

If Jerry Lee Lewis could get away with marrying his 13-yearold cousin, Berry had no such luck after taking a 14-year-old Apache girl across state lines in 1959

The Mann Act was a way that uppity – or successful – ‘‘nigras’’ could be kept in their place: even on appeal Berry served a year and a half in prison. Such injustices left their mark on Berry the man, fuelling an already substantia­l temper. He became suspicious of promoters, demanding payment up front and his live performanc­es suffered because he relied on pickup bands while touring.

There’s also the sneaking suspicion that he failed to give pianist Johnnie Johnson, his onetime mentor and long-term collaborat­or, sufficient credit.

Worse things still can be alleged about Berry if we chose to believe stories about the installati­on of surveillan­ce cameras in the toilets of one of his restaurant­s.

The manner in which he did or not play with his ding-a-ling in later years threatened to detract from the art. Chuck Berry’s musical legacy is neverthele­ss beyond reproach.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand