Upgrades expected at city hospital

Palmerston North Hospital’s ‘‘austere, unfriendly’’ high-needs unit is expected to be revamped as part of an upgrade that also includes the mental health ward.

The Midcentral District Health Board is weighing up its options, which include adding more space or a complete rebuild of that part of the hospital.

Midcentral mental health and addictions services director Christopher Nolan presented an update to the board’s quality and excellence advisory committee recently.

The mental health ward’s area of about 1400 square metres was insufficient, he said in the report.

Options for the upgrade include rebuilding the high-needs unit, which would add 720sqm to the area.

Or there could be a complete rebuild, on an area between 2500 and 2700sqm.

The mental health ward, ward 21, had been identified in the past as having significant risk for patients who might harm themselves.

The ward has been at the centre of scrutiny after a series of suspected self-inflicted deaths.

Other issues included its layout and poor visibility and lack of activity areas.

The report said the high-needs unit was ‘‘austere, unfriendly and not considered to be conducive to recovery’’.

Although progress was being made, Nolan said there had been some delays.

Committee member Dennis Emery urged his peers to ‘‘please just get on with it’’.

Chief executive Kathryn Cook said they were getting on with upgrading the unit, which was only 15 years old.

‘‘It’s 15 years old and here we are talking potentially about either building a brand new unit or significantly changing and adding to that unit.

‘‘A new build should have a longer life than 15 years, so we don’t want to find ourselves rushing at something and not achieving the outcomes that we need.’’

General manager of finance and corporate support Neil Wanden said there was a slow start, but the project was now ‘‘well on the way’’.

The upgrade would involve ‘‘significant investment’’. The costs were not yet known.

‘‘We haven’t done detailed design here yet – there’s a lot of work to be done.’’

Wanden said the scale of the options would likely affect the project’s timeframe.

If the project was to go above the $8 million to $10m mark, for example, ‘‘a couple of years’’ could be added to the timeframe, he said.

It was important to get the foundations right, he said.

‘‘We don’t need to spend our dollars twice and we don’t get to solve this problem twice. We need to solve it once.’’

Committee member Barbara Robson said it was important to get the design right.

Committee chairwoman Diane Anderson said it was good to see the project moving.

The committee would be informed of the project’s development at a meeting in September.

From there, the recommended option would be developed into a detailed business case.