Wider Russian probe routine
STATES: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said yesterday that the expanding investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election is continuing apace, even as President Donald Trump dismissed the probe as ‘‘a total fabrication’’.
Rosenstein said Special Counsel Robert Mueller can investigate any crimes that he might discover within the scope of his probe, but the deputy attorney general would not discuss which individuals are the subject of their inquiry. The comment comes after Trump said he believes it would be inappropriate for Mueller to dig into Trump family finances.
‘‘The special counsel is subject to the rules and regulations of the Department of Justice, and we don’t engage in fishing expeditions,’’ Rosenstein said when asked about the probe.
Rosenstein declined to comment on reports that Mueller is using a grand jury in a court in Washington to aid in his investigation but he said that such a step is a routine part of ‘‘many investigations’’.
‘‘It’s an appropriate way to gather documents, sometimes to bring witnesses in, to make sure that you get their full testimony,’’ Rosenstein said. ‘‘It’s just a tool that we use like any other tool in the course of our investigations. ‘‘
Trump and his inner circle have repeatedly dismissed the investigation amid frequent reports that Mueller and his team are digging into broader details on the financial dealings of members of Trump’s campaign team.
Senior White House counsellor Kellyanne Conway called the probe a ‘‘fabrication’’. Trump called it ‘‘the totally made-up Russia story’’ in a campaign-style speech he delivered on Friday in West Virginia.
The attacks have raised concerns among Democrats and some
UNITED
"The special counsel is subject to the rules and regulations of the Department of Justice, and we don't engage in fishing expeditions." Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General
Republicans that Trump may be looking for ways to undermine the investigation. Those fears led Senators Thom Tillis (Republican) and Christopher Coons (Democrat) to propose legislation that would give a judge the ability to review any decision by the president to fire Muller.
Tillis said yesterday he does not agree the investigation is a witchhunt and said the bill is intended to bolster the independence of the Justice Department.
‘‘We’ll let the facts lead us to whether or not it was a hoax or a distraction. But we are where we are, and I want to see this investigation concluded so that we can get on to doing the good work the president has already started with regulatory reform, health care and tax reform.’’
Rep Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, called Mueller’s impanelling of a grand jury ‘‘a significant development’’, noting that it has been more than a year since former FBI director James Comey launched a counterintelligence investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.
‘‘That means one year later, rather than turning that investigation off, rather than concluding ‘We’ve looked at this for a year; there’s really nothing to see here,’ as the president would claim, instead . . . it’s moving into a new phase,’’ Schiff said. ’’That wouldn’t be taking place if there was really no evidence, no evidentiary basis to move forward.’’
He said an additional reason to continue investigating was the disclosure of the June 2016 meeting of Donald Trump Jr, campaign officials and a Russian lawyer, which had the advertised purpose of sharing damaging information on Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
‘‘And now you add on the layer of the president, if these allegations are true, helping to fabricate a false statement about what that meeting was about,’’ Schiff said, referring to the White House’s acknowledgment that Trump weighed in on an initial statement issued by Trump Jr about the meeting that did not mention its pretext.
– Washington Post