Manawatu Standard

Staff gave cellphones to inmates

- BLAIR ENSOR

Staff at one of the country’s largest jails played favourites with inmates, allowing them access to cellphones during covert informatio­n-gathering operations.

A major Department of Correction­s inquiry last year unearthed ‘‘extremely serious allegation­s’’ relating to ‘‘a number of substandar­d management and security practices’’ at Christchur­ch Men’s Prison.

The findings of the security review have been referred to the police, who are investigat­ing.

Three of the jail’s senior staff – prison director John Roper, who is on a final warning, security manager John Cooper and residentia­l unit manager Doug Smith – have been on ‘‘special leave’’ since concerns about ‘‘security procedures’’ at the prison were raised in May last year.

Stuff was leaked two pages of the department’s draft findings last year, which revealed elite guards from the prison’s Site Emergency Response Team (SERT) illegally spied on inmates using unauthoris­ed covert devices.

Correction­s refused to release the full investigat­ion report, which was completed in August, because it says it contains informatio­n that could prejudice the ongoing police investigat­ion, endanger people’s lives and discourage confidenti­al informants.

However, the chief ombudsman, following a complaint from

Stuff, ruled a summary of the findings should be released, which Correction­s made available late last week.

It says the department’s investigat­ion report, which was passed to police late last year because of the ‘‘serious nature of the findings’’, ‘‘indicates non-compliance with legislatio­n and security procedures’’, including the Correction­s Act.

Use of cellphones

‘‘The issues identified as part of the security review relate to failing to action a number of intelligen­ce reports and telephone monitoring disclosure­s, use of cellphones and the use of covert audio devices,’’ the summary says.

The review found staff gave ‘‘favourable treatment’’ to some inmates who, according to the leaked documents, were given cellphones during covert operations. Cellphones are contraband in prison.

An ex-prison guard, who did not want to be named, said playing favourites with inmates and giving them items like cellphones was dangerous and ‘‘against everything we’re taught at college’’.

Prisoners could use the unauthoris­ed activity to blackmail guards into getting them drugs and other illicit items, the exguard said.

Canterbury district crime manager Detective Inspector Darryl Sweeney confirmed last week police were investigat­ing a ‘‘narrow’’ part of the department’s findings.

Correction­s previously confirmed three staff had been ‘‘subject to disciplina­ry action’’ since the department’s investigat­ion report was finalised in August. It is understood the group included SERT members. At least one of them received a final warning. ‘Special leave’

The department said last week three other staff – understood to be Roper, Cooper and Smith – remained on ‘‘special leave’’. Employment action was ‘‘ongoing’’. In an email to staff a fortnight ago, Correction­s southern regional commission­er Ben Clark acknowledg­ed the ‘‘ongoing uncertaint­y may be unsettling’’ for some.

A prison source said the investigat­ion had dragged on too long. The wages of the three managers sidelined on full-pay could have funded several new prison guards to cover shortages.

‘‘There’s a lot of people disillusio­ned,’’ the source said.

SERTS were set up at several of the country’s prisons after an inquiry into a riot at Spring Hill Correction­s Facility in Waikato in 2013.

There were concerns the teams had a similar mandate to the Emergency Response Unit, dubbed the ‘‘goon squad’’, which operated out of Canterbury until it was disbanded in 2000 amid complaints of bullying inmates and aggressive treatment of members.

In April last year, Stuff reported Roper and Smith received employment warnings after an inmate at the prison self-harmed while left on his own for several hours in an exercise yard on June 21 last year. The incident took nine days to be flagged at a national level after local staff failed to report it.

Roper previously warned staff they would ‘‘face the consequenc­es’’ for leaking informatio­n to the media.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand