Thirty minutes in Salisbury
Salisbury is a nice old English town with a fine cathedral, only an hour and a half from London by train, but it doesn’t see many Russian tourists in wintertime. It’s not as cold as Moscow, but Russians tend to prefer Mediterranean destinations for holiday breaks in early March – unless, of course, they are planning to kill somebody.
The person of interest in Salisbury was Sergei Skripal, a former member of the Russian military intelligence service who started selling information to the British in the mid-1990s and was caught and jailed by the Russians in 2004. He was pardoned and allowed to go to Britain as part of a spy swap between Western countries and Russia in 2010, and he settled in Salisbury.
On March 4, Skripal and his daughter, who was visiting from Moscow, were found semi-conscious on a bench in the street in Salisbury and taken to a hospital. They spend weeks in intensive care and it was determined that they had been poisoned by novichok, a Soviet-era nerve agent that falls into the category of banned chemical weapons.
Many people pointed out it would have been foolish for Moscow to choose such a complicated method and risk exposure. Why didn’t it just hire a non-russian hitman to do the job? But Moscow has done this sort of thing before: Russian agents, exotic substances, the lot.
Alexander Litvinenko, a member of the FSB secret service, got into trouble after his investigation into links between Russian mafia groups and his organisation made him unpopular with Vladimir Putin, the FSB’S head. Litvinenko fled Russia for Britain after Putin took over the presidency in 2000.
Litvinenko remained a harsh critic of Putin and in 2006 Dmitry Kovtun and Andrei Lugovoy, both former FSB agents, were sent to London to kill him. CCTV images showed the killers with Litvinenko at a London hotel where they dosed his tea with a tiny amount of polonium-210, a highly toxic radioactive substance not normally spotted because it does not emit gamma rays.
That was a reasonably competent operation, exposed only by bad luck. But then it got weird. Putin publicly urged the two men to go on TV and last Thursday they appeared on RT, a Russian international news channel, to explain their brief trip, which gave them only 54 hours in England.
‘‘Our friends had been suggesting for a long time that we visit this wonderful town,’’ said Petrov. They especially wanted to see Salisbury Cathedral, said Boshirov.
‘‘It’s famous for its 123-metre spire. It’s famous for its clock ...’’ But they looked like heavies from Central Casting and not at all like clock-tower enthusiasts.
Why did they only spend 30 minutes in Salisbury the first time?
‘‘It was cold.’’ (It was 10 degrees C warmer than Moscow.) Why did they take another train down to Salisbury the next day? ‘‘We really wanted to see Old Sarum and the cathedral.’’ (Old Sarum is an Iron-age hill fort near Salisbury that was closed on March 4).
And on March 4 one of the CCTV cameras picked them up close to Skripal’s house and far from the cathedral or any other tourist attractions.
Is Russia deliberately trolling the British government to show its contempt?
Probably not, because it has tried hard to distance itself from the crime in other international venues. The Salisbury debacle would not have happened 18 years ago, when Putin’s reign was new. It suggests the regime is a lot closer to its end than its beginning.
Beauden couldn’t have kicked a barn door on Saturday and assuming he still had the nerve, he could have lobbed over a threepointer from pointblank with one toe.