The reluctant Rohingyas

The Rohingyas are about a million Bengalispeaking people who used to live in Rakhine state in Myanmar – until late last year. Then the Burmese army attacked them, claiming they were illegal immigrants. Thousands were killed, tens of thousands were raped, their villages were burned – and at least 700,000 of them are now in refugee camps across the border in Bangladesh.

The United Nations has described these Burmese actions as ‘‘ethnic cleansing’’, ‘‘crimes against humanity’’ and ‘‘genocide’’, but the Burmese army denies any wrongdoing. So does its civilian political partner, ‘‘special counsellor’’ Aung San Suu Kyi. Remember her? She used to be a secular saint.

Bangladesh doesn’t want all these refugees, most of whom have no ties with the country although they speak Bengali, so last month it made a deal with Myanmar to send them back. But Myanmar doesn’t really want them back either. If it did, why would it have bothered to drive them out in the first place?

The United Nations has no part in this great ‘‘repatriation’’, nor any of the NGOS either. It was a private deal between Bangladesh and Myanmar and the Burmese army knew perfectly well that the refugees would be too terrified to go back. Agreeing to take them back just made the generals who planned the atrocity look a little less vile.

The Bangladeshi authorities fell for it and chose 2200 Rohingya refugees to go back in the first contingent. The Rohingyas weren’t fooled and most of them immediately went into hiding, changing camps or fleeing into the woods.

The Rohingya won’t go back because they are afraid for their lives. It wasn’t just the army. but their own non-muslim neighbours who turned on them and took part in the slaughter. If you are recalling images of the massacres and expulsions of Bosnian Muslims by the Bosnian Serbs in the 1990s, you are absolutely right. It’s happening again and, again, nobody is doing anything effective to stop it.

How did it come to this? All the South-east Asian countries contain minority groups, but Myanmar takes it to extremes. Bamars – ethnic ‘‘Burmese’’ – account for two-thirds of the population, but there are eight other recognised ethnic groups, most with their own language or languages. And there are the Rohingya, who were stripped of their citizenship by Myanmar’s military dictatorship in 1982.

Why them? They were only 2 per cent of Burma’s population, they are, however, Muslims, and Myanmar’s Buddhist majority is paranoid about Muslims.

It goes back a long way. Buddhism once dominated Asia, but it has been in retreat for a long time. The first Bengali-speaking Muslims arrived in Rakhine state in the 15th century as soldiers helping an exiled king regain his throne. The last significant wave of immigration was in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

It’s now the 21st century, and there is no excuse for what the Burmese army has done: to understand all is not to forgive all.

Neither is there any excuse for Nobel Peace Prize winner Suu Kyi.

Yes, she was trying to preserve a hard-won democratic opening that might close if she openly criticised the army. Moreover, the average Burmese heartily approves of what the army has done – shades of Serbia again. But she is condoning and covering up a genocide. Shame on her.

If NZ Rugby has any sense, they will dial up Dave Rennie and Joe Schmidt, who has always said he wants to return home.