Battle is more than treatment
Thousands of people are diagnosed with cancer in New Zealand every year. But many New Zealanders live lives free of the disease. A key focus of many cancer researchers, like myself, is understanding who is most vulnerable to developing cancer, and why, so we can stop the disease before it takes hold.
We often hear the argument that we need more cancer treatments, new drugs, and we do. However, the cost of these new treatments is huge.
If we really want to reduce the impact of cancer in this country, we need to aim higher. We need long-term cancer prevention strategies. As the director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer noted: ‘‘No country, however wealthy, can afford to treat its way out of the cancer problem.’’
We have seen successful health initiatives targeting cancer prevention to at-risk individuals – the reduction of smoking and lung cancer, the introduction of vaccinations for human papilloma virus to prevent cervical cancer, and sun protection to prevent skin cancer, are but a few.
Genetic testing has also been extremely successful in finding people who have inherited damaged DNA from their parents that increases their risk of cancers. Studies suggest that about one in 200 people carry a genetic change that places them in a high-risk category for breast and ovarian cancer. Unfortunately many of these people do not know they are at high risk. Our challenge is to find these high-risk individuals and identify their disease-causing mutations.
Genetic testing technologies have advanced massively over the past two decades. Twenty years ago it cost more than $100 million, using machines that filled a warehouse, to get a complete printout of our genetic code.
Today we can do this work for around $1000 with machines the size of a muesli bar. Think of what might be achievable in the next 20 years.
This presents a massive opportunity for our health system but also a challenge. We can be less restrictive about who gets genetic screening but will need greater resourcing of clinical genetics to interpret the data this rapidly improving technology produces and, importantly, what it means for individual patients.
Interpreting the genetic test results is a challenge. Our DNA code is complex. We inherit 3 billion letters of code from our mothers and another 3 billion from our father. That’s 6 billion letters of code for genetic scientists to sift through for each individual.
Leo Tolstoy’s book War and Peace has about 3 million letters. Imagine asking your doctor to search through 2000 copies of War and Peace for a single spelling mistake. Thankfully, computing tools allow us to find these genetic changes relatively easy, but the crucial next step is understanding what the changes mean, if anything, for a person’s risk of developing cancer.
To decide if changes cause cancer we need to work with cancer specialists from around the globe. Despite huge international collaborations, there are many genetic changes tests that sit in the ‘‘too hard basket’’ because there is not a large enough critical mass of patients showing them in a particular geographic location. Only with more research will we build sufficient understanding to make an informed decision for the patient and their family members.
Some people are unaware they are blindly walking towards a proverbial cliff because they do not know they are at high risk of developing cancer in their lifetime. However, if we know their genetic code, we can map their path, and potentially apply some interventions that prevent cancer. This is needed to save lives and it is not only important for the patient but also for their family members, who may share the same genetic vulnerabilities.
More barriers are needed for the top of the cliff. We have only begun to scratch the surface of what might be possible for cancer prevention.
Only with foresight and investment will our children be spared the personal and financial costs associated with this disease.
Powerless bodies primarily charged with tasks such as cake stalls do not draw on people’s sense of responsibility in the same way.