Manawatu Standard

ANZ house sale broke rules

- Susan Edmunds susan.edmunds@stuff.co.nz

ANZ should have disclosed the sale of a house to its former chief executive’s wife as a related-party transactio­n, the Financial Markets Authority says.

It has completed its inquiry into disclosure by ANZ of the sale of the property at 269 St Heliers Bay Rd by its company Arawata Assets to Deborah Veronica Walsh.

In June, Stuff revealed the bank paid $7.55 million for the St Heliers house in early 2011, for former CEO David Hisco and his family to live in. It was on-sold to Hisco’s wife, Deborah Walsh, for $6.9m in July 2017. The property is estimated to have been worth $11m at the time. The deal should have been noted as a related-party transactio­n in the bank’s 2017 financial statements, the authority (FMA) said.

The FMA said its determinat­ion was primarily based on the nature of the transactio­n, which it said made the disclosure material for financial reporting purposes. It announced it would probe the deal in June.

The FMA said it had not assessed the appropriat­eness of the sale price.

The luxurious 700 square metre ocean-view home, reached by a private driveway that runs off the main St Heliers Bay road, includes a heated swimming pool, tennis court and six bedrooms.

In a statement, ANZ said the sale price to Walsh was determined following a process to ascertain the value of the property with reference to external, independen­t valuations.

It said the applicatio­n of accounting standards for relatedpar­ty disclosure­s required judgments to be made on what informatio­n is ‘‘quantitati­vely or qualitativ­ely material’’.

‘‘No specific related-party disclosure was made in ANZ New Zealand’s audited 2017 financial statements, as the sale of the property was not considered by ANZ New Zealand and its external auditor to be material to an understand­ing of ANZ New Zealand’s financial performanc­e and financial position.

‘‘ANZ disagrees with the FMA’S finding as it considers the transactio­n not to be material informatio­n on the basis that this disclosure could not influence the economic decisions of the users of financial statements.’’

The bank said it took financial reporting obligation­s seriously and and acknowledg­ed that the FMA had reached a different conclusion to that reached by ANZ and its external auditor.

The FMA has informed the Reserve Bank of its determinat­ion, reflecting its role in banking supervisio­n, and as part of the joint focus on conduct and culture. The Australian Securities and Investment­s Commission, as the primary regulator of ANZ’S parent company, has also been informed, it said.

The FMA is continuing to engage with ANZ and will require it to issue a corrective statement relating to the 2017 financial statements, the regulator said.

‘‘ANZ disagrees with the FMA’S finding as it considers the transactio­n not to be material informatio­n...’’ ANZ statement

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand