Manawatu Standard

Charges laid against nine raw milk suppliers

- Samuel Kilmister

Nine raw milk suppliers accused of putting consumer health at risk are facing criminal proceeding­s.

The Ministry for Primary Industries laid charges against the suppliers this week, following a 12-month investigat­ion.

During a co-ordinated sting in December last year, ministry staff shut down sales of raw milk from dairy farms in Manawatu¯, Horowhenua, Auckland, Hawke’s Bay, Nelson and Southland.

During the raids, 62 compliance officers seized everything from client lists to computer hard drives.

Of the farms raided, five had partnershi­p or herd share agreements and two were selling raw milk as cosmetic or bath milk.

The distributi­on methods used via these agreements are illegal under rules that came into effect in 2016.

They require dairy farmers to register if they want to produce raw milk, and follow hygiene rules for bottling, storing and distributi­ng the milk.

That’s because unpasteuri­sed milk that hasn’t been treated carries more risk of food poisoning and has been linked to gastrointe­stinal outbreaks.

Gary Orr, the ministry’s director of compliance services, confirmed the charges in a statement to Stuff yesterday.

The charges vary from supplier to supplier, but relate to failing to comply with the Animal Products Act, breaches of notices and obstructio­n.

Ian Mckelvie Rangitı¯kei MP

In some cases it is alleged the failure to comply was with the knowledge they could create a risk to human health.

Phillippa Martin, who owns Mannamilk with husband John, is defending their operation, south of Levin, as safer than what the law mandates.

She was unaware the charges had been laid when Stuff contacted her yesterday morning.

Martin was shocked the ministry had released the informatio­n publicly without notifying the affected suppliers.

A ministry spokesman said charges were filed in the courts before defendants were notified.

This could take days or weeks.

Martin said that lawyers had advised them the ministry didn’t have jurisdicti­on over a limited partnershi­p model.

But the system is untested in court. Earlier in the week, Rangitı¯kei MP Ian Mckelvie said he was surprised the ministry took 12months to conduct its investigat­ion. Meanwhile, farmers were left in limbo.

‘‘It must be very frustratin­g for the farmers concerned.

‘‘I also find it interestin­g MPI are not keeping the farmers up to date with their decision-making progress.’’

The new regulation­s came about after raw milk was responsibl­e for a significan­t gastro outbreak in Timaru in 2014.

It resulted in seven people contractin­g campylobac­ter, New Zealand’s most notified gastrointe­stinal disease. In response, the Government tightened hygiene standards, while any milk delivered off-farm required customers to sign for it and volumes to be recorded. Farms were required to store milk in ministryre­gistered vending machines or secure fridge depots, where the milk could then be picked up by customers. However, it’s alleged some suppliers found a loophole to avoid the associated compliance costs, which are said to be between $10,000 and $20,000.

A briefing to former Food Safety Minister Damien O’connor, obtained by Stuff earlier this year, stated the ministry was losing about $60,000 and $75,000 a year since the new regulation­s came into play.

‘‘It must be very frustratin­g for the farmers concerned. I also find it interestin­g MPI are not keeping the farmers up to date with their decisionma­king progress.’’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand