As he exits, Trump again abuses the pardon power
In one of his last acts as president Donald J. Trump again exercised his constitutional authority to ‘‘grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States’’ in an irresponsible and offensive way – fortunately for the last time.
Trump has been a uniquely unprincipled president. But the way he has used the pardon power to benefit cronies, political allies and the father of his son-in-law underlines just how expansive that power is – and why Trump’s successor must be pressed, including by Congress, to exercise it impartially.
As he has done in the past, Trump extended clemency to some deserving recipients, including nonviolent drug offenders. But there were also grants of clemency that favoured people with ties to the president or the Republican Party. Most egregiously, Trump pardoned his longtime adviser Stephen K. Bannon, who had been chargedwith fraud and money laundering in an alleged scheme to swindle supporters of Trump’s border wall. The pardon for Bannon follows Trump’s previous pardons of self-described ‘‘dirty trickster’’ Roger Stone, former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former national security advisermichael Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI.
Trump also pardoned several politicians convicted of corruption charges, including former Republican Reps. Randy ‘‘Duke’’ Cunningham of California, Rick Renzi of Arizona and Robin Hayes of North Carolina, adding to the list of disgraced former office holders whom Trump has favoured. Also pardonedwas 1MDB investment scandals major Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy, who’d pleaded guilty to unregistered lobbying on behalf of foreign interests seeking to end a federal investigation into the 1MDB investment scandal.
(Not all of the recipients of clemencywere Republicans; Trump commuted the sentence of Democrat Kwame Kilpatrick, a former Detroit mayor convicted of racketeering and bribery who had lavishly praised Trump from prison.)
The new grants of clemency were notable for what they didn’t include: an arguably unconstitutional attempt by former United States President Donald Trump to pardon himself.
That may reflect less a sudden case of scruples than a fear that such an outrageous act would alienate senatorswho will sit as the jury in Trump’s second impeachment trial.
Other presidents have abused the pardon power. In 1992 George Hwbush pardoned former Secretary of Defence Caspar Weinberger, who faced perjury charges arising from the IranContra scandal. On his last day in office in 2000, President Bill Clinton pardoned Marc Rich, a fugitive financier whose former wife had made large donations to Democrats and the Clinton library. That pardon prompted a congressional investigation.
But Trump is in a contemptible class by himself in theway he has used this power. Last July, in response to Trump’s decision to commute Oliver Stone’s sentence— the first of two times Trump used his power to benefit his longtime friend— House Speaker Nancy Pelosi proposed that Congress enact legislation to ensure ’’no president can pardon or commute the sentence of an individual who is engaged in a cover-up campaign to shield that president from criminal prosecution’’.
That idea raised constitutional issues, given the expansive authority the Constitution affords the president in the exercise of clemency. But later House Democrats proposed legislation that would sensibly require the Department of Justice and the White House to provide Congress withmaterials about ‘‘any selfserving presidential pardon or commutation in cases involving the president or his-her relatives, contempt of Congress, or obstruction of Congress’’. The proposal also would have banned presidential self-pardons.
Most presidentswon’t pervert the conduct of their office theway Trump did. But the almost limitless scope of the pardon power obligates presidents to treat it as an instrument of impartial mercy, not as a personal perk. With rare exceptions, presidents should issue pardons only if they have been processed through the office set up for that sole purpose, the pardon attorney in the Department of Justice. That office also needs to ensure its recommendations aren’t warped by racial discrimination.
Trump allowed personal and political favouritism to taint a constitutional power that should be exercised for the greater good. Beginning with Joe Biden, his successors must do better.