Manawatu Standard

Realising the value of our volunteers

- Former academic and Palmerston North business owner Letters to the editor Opinion Steve Stannard

Volunteers are gold. They are the undergroun­d army who do something, not for financial reward, but for a greater good or to help others, usuallywhi­le providing some personal fulfilment.

Paying someone to do a job means that you can outline the nature of that job, instruct the tasks required, and call them to account if the work is not done properly.

And paying someone in a job is like a retainer; even if they don’t particular­ly enjoy the work, they will come back for more because they need the money.

Not so a volunteer who can walk away if the work becomes a drag.

Managing or directing a team of volunteers is a real skill. You need to be able to encourage/ cajole them so that the work gets done, and then enable them to get sufficient satisfacti­on that they’ll stick around and continue helping out.

This involves respecting the volunteer and their time, and profuse thanks afterwards to indicate how much their effort is valued.

All too often though, volunteers are not respected or valued. Their work is not acknowledg­ed and thankless.

The most common volunteer (unpaid) job in the world is being a fulltime caregiver of a relative. Most of those are mums, and increasing­ly dads.

Many full-time parents are also volunteers at school or sport or church, or look after the children of others after school where people in paid work don’t have time.

Fulltime parents are the top tier of volunteers, and they are gold.

Yet, our society seems to have been fooled into thinking that, if someone is not paid, their work has little value.

And it follows that the more someone is paid, the higher their status and the more valuablewe think the work that they do.

However, when you have a hard look this, the reverse is mostly true.

People that are paid least are cleaners, early childhood workers, agricultur­al labourers, and nursing home staff. People that are paid most are senior executives, marketing gurus, and financial wizards.

I would hazard a guess that we could do without many of the latter, but society would cease to function without the former. Noone has yet been able to explain to me exactly what contributi­on a futures trader makes to society for example, but they still make plenty of lolly.

Internatio­nal Women’s Day was held recently, and among other things, it occasioned celebratio­n of the achievemen­ts of noteworthy women.

Outstandin­g profession­als are put up on a pedestal because they are paid a load of money to be directors, executives, high flyers, and tell other lesser paid people what to do. I guess someone’s got to do it.

But not once during Women’s Day celebratio­ns, or in the weeks since, have I seen acknowledg­ement of those doing the most important work of all; that of being amum. And since when has being a dad been put at the top of the totem pole?

I suppose there is Mothers’ Day and Father’s Day, but those events are commercial.the problem about being defined by the status of your job is that one day you won’t have either. As my elderly German aunt used to say ‘‘once a rooster, now a feather duster’’; a descriptio­n, obviously, for high-flying men past their prime.

Modern men and increasing­ly women, in their flight to the top roost, would do well to take heed.

 ?? WARWICK SMITH/STUFF ?? Rural residents upset banks have ignored their pleas for cheques to remain an option, from left, John Heron, Mary Kane and Julie Rush.
WARWICK SMITH/STUFF Rural residents upset banks have ignored their pleas for cheques to remain an option, from left, John Heron, Mary Kane and Julie Rush.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand