Marlborough Express

‘Dirty dairy’ farmer to sue Fonterra for losses

-

financial consequenc­es’’ which resulted in the appointmen­t of receivers.

Woolley wanted $1.8m from Fonterra to cover the loss of milk, another $629,486 for the cost of paying out his contract milker, and an inquiry to find out how much Fonterra should pay towards the $3.4m cost of receiversh­ip and other expenses.

Fonterra sought a summary judgment from Associate Judge John Matthews in the High Court to stop Woolley from suing.

The company had to prove that on the balance of probabilit­ies, would fail.

At a hearing in November, Fonterra’s lawyer Murray Branch said the company was under pressure from the council not to collect milk from Glenmae.

Despite receiving the requested certificat­e, the council’s lawyer Miriam Radich, of Radich Law, said Woolley had not yet met the enforcemen­t order.

Woolley’s lawyer David Clark said the case should be referred to the company’s milk commission­er, appointed as an independen­t solicitor to resolve disputes between Fonterra and shareholde­rs. Woolley’s suit

But the milk commission­er was Peter Radich – the council’s lawyer’s father, and partner at the same practice.

‘‘Obviously that cannot happen as he is not independen­t as far as this matter is concerned,’’ Clark wrote to Fonterra’s lawyer, Alison Brewer-shearer.

She replied that as long as council disputed Woolley’s entitlemen­t to start milking again, Fonterra would also refuse to take the milk.

Clark accused Fonterra of treating Woolley’s livelihood in a flippant manner.

Brewer-shearer said the company was giving ‘‘careful considerat­ion’’ to the issues and would ‘‘continue to provide as much assistance as possible’’.

She told the court Fonterra did not want to collect milk in breach of Environmen­t Court orders.

Judge Matthews said Fonterra’s suspension notice was not the same as a terminatio­n of contract, and implied that when the problem causing the suspension was fixed, the suspension would end.

Fonterra’s applicatio­n fell ‘‘well short’’ of proving Woolley’s suit would fail, Judge Matthews said.

A trial date for Woolley’s suit has not yet been set.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand