Nelson Mail

No compo for ex-orchardist

- GERARD HUTCHING

Former kiwifruit orchardist Wendy Arthur believes she is the only grower in the country who tore out all her plants after the Psa disease struck in 2010.

If she had left the old rootstock in the ground and grafted on the new Gold 3 variety, as other growers did, she would probably have a thriving business today.

The Waihi resident was never compensate­d, as others were. But she has decided not to join in the class ‘‘Kiwifruit Claim’’ action about to play out in the Wellington High Court, because ‘‘in the end I just had to put it behind me and suck it up and move on’’.

A total of 212 growers and postharves­t operators are claiming losses of $376.4 million in a case that alleges the Government was negligent in letting Psa into New Zealand in 2010.

The class action, being run by litigation funder the LPF Group chaired by former Supreme Court judge Bill Wilson, was due to start this week. It will last at least 12 weeks.

Arthur’s experience left her bitter, following ‘‘vicious’’ emails from other growers who pressured her to remove her infected vines. Fortunatel­y she had a 600-cow dairy farm as well as the five hectare orchard in the Waihi Valley, which meant she was in a more secure financial situation than other growers. That might have contribute­d to the coercion applied to her, she feels.

Arthur said Kiwi Vine Health (KVH) - the industry body charged with dealing with Psa from December 2010 - had advised her to completely remove the vines.

Of the 5ha, one had been planted in 1980, while the remaining four had only just been establishe­d and were not yet producing.

KVH contests aspects of her claim. It says it told growers in 2011 it was up to them whether or not to completely remove the vines.

‘‘KVH’s position was that although it supported any individual’s own decision to completely remove vines from the orchard, it was not a requiremen­t from KVH, and as such not compensate­d. KVH did however in 2011 pay for the cut out and disposal costs of this orchard which were considerab­le.’’

Arthur said she offered to take out a hectare at her own cost but KVH did the job ‘‘for nothing’’, and considered this was by of compensati­on. Noone had ever told her to leave the rootstock in the ground so that the new gold variety could be grafted on. ‘‘They wanted it gone’’, she said.

KVH said Arthur then contacted them with her concerns in 2012, and they met with her and her packhouse Seeka several times to discuss the issues she raised and investigat­ed the situation, including seeking extensive legal opinion.

In the early stages of the outbreak, KVH had compensate­d a small group of Te Puke growers whose orchards had become infected.

But once the KVH strategy changed from eradicatin­g Psa to containing it, this early compensati­on package was deemed ‘‘no longer appropriat­e’’ and no longer available to growers from March 2011, KVH said in a statement.

The growers were given $17m, out of a total aid package of $50m.

 ?? PHOTO: MIKE SCOTT/STUFF ?? There are competing claims within the manuka honey industry over which method is the best at determinin­g ‘‘real’’ from ‘‘fake’’ honey.
PHOTO: MIKE SCOTT/STUFF There are competing claims within the manuka honey industry over which method is the best at determinin­g ‘‘real’’ from ‘‘fake’’ honey.
 ??  ?? Wendy Arthur
Wendy Arthur

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand