Nelson Mail

Calls to eject 7 MPs for ‘wilful blindness’

-

AUSTRALIA: All federal MPs who had foreign citizenshi­p at the time of last year’s election must be disqualifi­ed from Parliament because ignorance – or ‘‘wilful blindness’’ – is not a valid defence, the High Court has been told.

Lawyers for former Greens senators Scott Ludlam and Larissa Waters have sought to demolish the government’s argument that five of the seven MPs under a constituti­onal cloud should be allowed to stay in Parliament.

In their written submission to the court filed late on Thursday, the lawyers argue the Commonweal­th’s claims are ‘‘not supported by the text, context, history or purpose’’ of the constituti­on.

The government cannot ignore the ‘‘clear wording’’ of the nation’s founding text just because it is politicall­y inconvenie­nt, they say.

‘‘Ignorance or wilful blindness ought not excuse a person from the constraint­s of the constituti­on that would disqualify a more diligent or more perceptive candidate,’’ the submission reads. ’’In complying with obligation­s under the constituti­on, negligence should never produce a more favourable result than diligence. The referrals presently before the court fall into the category of ignorance or wilful blindness.’’

While the government’s argument – if accepted by the court – would pave the way for Waters to return to the Senate, her lawyers insist she and Ludlam did the right thing by immediatel­y resigning.

In a submission filed earlier in the week, Attorney-General George Brandis argued only Ludlam and One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts were wrongfully elected because they knew – or should have known – of their foreign ties. By contrast, Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce, fellow Nationals Fiona Nash and Matt Canavan, crossbench­er Nick Xenophon and Waters were all completely ignorant of their dual citizenshi­ps and should be allowed to stay.

But the Greens’ lawyers say there is no requiremen­t in the constituti­on that a person take any deliberate or voluntary step to acquire or retain a foreign citizenshi­p: ‘‘The disqualifi­cation is simply a question of fact: is the person a citizen of a foreign power? If so, that person is incapable of being chosen.’’

They point out that all seven of the referred politician­s were aware they had foreign heritage but none sought profession­al advice about their status before the 2016 election.

The government has also expanded on its argument in the formal submission­s lodged by Joyce, Nash and Canavan, which all lean heavily on the ignorance defence.

Lawyers for Joyce admit that ‘‘at all relevant times [he] was aware that his father had been born in New Zealand’’.

‘‘Nonetheles­s, from the age of about 10, Joyce believed that his father was a citizen of Australia and no other country,’’ the submission says.

‘‘Mr Joyce was not aware of the possibilit­y that he might have been a citizen of New Zealand until late July 2017, at the earliest.’’

They argue section 44 should not ‘‘be given its unqualifie­d literal meaning’’.

‘‘It is difficult to understand how a foreign law could create, in an Australian citizen, a sense of duty of allegiance or obedience to a foreign power in the absence of any effective choice on the part of that citizen to affirm, or at least not to abandon, some form of relationsh­ip with the foreign power in question,’’ the submission reads.

Nash’s submission reveals that she knew her sisters were both British citizens, but thought that was a consequenc­e of them being born in England. Nash was born in Australia. Canavan’s lawyers argue he had ‘‘at best had only a very slender connection with Italy’’.

‘‘He was less than 3 years old when Italian citizenshi­p was conferred on him.

‘‘The legal reasons for this under Italian law were at best obscure,’’ the submission reads.

The court has already ruled that Roberts was a British citizen when he nominated last June, and he did not successful­ly renounce until December – five months into his tenure.

It is widely believed he will be disqualifi­ed next month.

The High Court will hold hearings into the matter between October 10 and 12. – Fairfax

 ?? PHOTO: SUPPLIED ?? Referred to the High Court: Nationals Fiona Nash, Barnaby Joyce and Matt Canavan.
PHOTO: SUPPLIED Referred to the High Court: Nationals Fiona Nash, Barnaby Joyce and Matt Canavan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand