Nelson Mail

Push to rescind GB grandstand demo decision

- Cherie Sivignon cherie.sivignon@stuff.co.nz

The Golden Bay grandstand may be thrown a lifeline.

Tasman District councillor­s are due tomorrow to consider a motion to rescind a majority decision made in May to remove the more than 100-year-old grandstand from its site at Takaka.

Some protesters started occupying the grandstand after the resolution to remove the structure passed 8:6 on May 24.

Cr Paul Sangster, of Golden Bay, was one of the six councillor­s who voted against the May motion. He and Crs Mark Greening, David Ogilvie, Dean McNamara and Dana Wensley signed a notice of motion to rescind the earlier decision. The matter is on the agenda for a meeting of the full council scheduled for tomorrow.

The draft resolution seeks the agreement of the council to rescind the May 24 decision. It also seeks agreement for the removal of the squash courts and rear lean-to by September 30, along with the reinstatem­ent of the grandstand stairs so it can be used.

In addition, the draft resolution seeks agreement for the grandstand to remain in situ for 12 months from September 30, and approval for the Golden Bay Restoratio­n Society to prepare a restoratio­n plan by September 30, 2019.

In a report on the issue, council chief executive Janine Dowding says councillor­s must turn their minds to a list of considerat­ions.

These are the issues around structural strength of the building; the building consents necessary to give effect to what is proposed; funding implicatio­ns; the ability of the Golden Bay Restoratio­n Society (or an alternativ­e group) to put forward a proposal; reporting requiremen­ts from the society on progress with the restoratio­n plan; the developmen­t of a relocation proposal that is realistic and achievable; formalitie­s of a lease at the site where the grandstand is to be relocated; satisfacto­ry foundation­s at the new site; whether a bond should be required to cover removal and remediatio­n costs in the event that an acceptable restoratio­n proposal does not eventuate; the cost of temporary groundwork­s to recontour and tidy the area around the new recreation centre and the grandstand following removal of the squash courts and lean-to; responsibi­lity for funding final site works once the grandstand has been removed; the effect on the existing building consent for the rec centre in relation to car parking, drainage works and measures to achieve either temporary or permanent compliance; a decision on whether further consultati­on is necessary; and terminatio­n or amendment of the contract with Gibbons Constructi­on as principal contractor to the Golden Bay Shared Recreation Facility project, in relation to the outstandin­g elements of that contract.

The move comes as the Golden Bay Grand Stand Community Trust and Golden Bay A&P Associatio­n seek a judicial review of the council’s decisions to demolish the grandstand. They have applied for interim relief to prevent demolition while awaiting determinat­ion of the judicial review. A hearing is scheduled for today.

 ?? NINA HINDMARSH/STUFF ?? Protesters occupied the historic Golden Bay grandstand after the Tasman District Council voted to remove it.
NINA HINDMARSH/STUFF Protesters occupied the historic Golden Bay grandstand after the Tasman District Council voted to remove it.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand