Who’s next? Mockery over Aust leadership
On Friday at 1.02pm, Australians were forced to endure a depressingly familiar sight: an MP emerged from a secret party meeting in Canberra to announce that the nation had a new prime minister.
Despite being the preferred Liberal leader of fewer than 10 per cent of Australians, Scott Morrison, a 50-year-old staunch conservative and evangelical Christian, had won a partyroom ballot to replace Malcolm Turnbull, a 63-year-old former investment banker and self-made millionaire.
A survey in April found that almost half of Australians had never heard of Morrison, who has just become the sixth prime minister in eight years.
‘‘Who’s Next?’’ asked the front page of the Northern Territory News.
‘‘It’s a bloody joke,’’ said a pedestrian interviewed by SBS News.
The ousting of Turnbull, a former Rhodes scholar who led the push for a republic in the Nineties, marks a worrying trend in Australia that now seems difficult to stop.
Each of Australia’s last four leaders has been toppled by their parties.
Labor’s Kevin Rudd was ousted in 2010 by Julia Gillard, who was ousted in 2013 by Rudd, and the Liberal leader Tony Abbott was toppled in 2015 by Turnbull, who was ousted at lunchtime on Friday in favour of Morrison. No Australian leader has served a full term since John Howard after the 2004 election.
‘‘Australia has cemented its reputation as the coup capital of the world,’’ said commentator Troy Bramston in The Australian. ‘‘The voters look on with horror as the deception, treachery and killings become routine. They know how the pantomime works.’’
This revolving-door leadership has made the nation a laughing stock and the chaos this week prompted fresh questions about the causes of this bizarre Australian phenomenon.
In recent decades, the nation’s MPs have increasingly entered politics after careers as political aides or lobbyists. With little experience outside politics, they are motivated by shortterm ambitions and are liable to be spooked by a poor run of opinion polls, now conducted with ever greater frequency.
In Australia, which follows the Westminster system, the party’s MPs have traditionally elected their own leader.
But this makes it easy for a small number of disgruntled MPs to demand a leadership ballot and produce instant instability. Australia’s Labor party, like Britain’s, now allows rankand-file members a say in electing leaders – and this week’s events have prompted calls for the Liberal party to do the same.
Jonathon Duniam, a Liberal MP, said yesterday: ‘‘Only two [MPs] can bring about a leadership spill, and as we’ve seen last week, once the action is put in motion, it can rarely be stopped.’’
But the deeper problem appears to be that Australia’s coups have proven selfperpetuating: they produce unelected prime ministers, who lack a mandate from the public and lead a party that will inevitably be riven by recrimination and internal feuds.
Turnbull was ousted this week following a rebellion led by a group of right-wing MPs – ‘‘wreckers,’’ he called them – who have long regarded him as too progressive. The most vocal of his critics was Abbott, a monarchist and long-term foe of Turnbull who has spent the past three years seeking to avenge his own ugly removal.
The rebels were supported by a group of right-wing pundits and socalled ‘‘shock jocks’’ – deliberately provocative radio hosts. Many of his fiercest critics were on Sky News, a cable television channel owned by Rupert Murdoch, which broadcasts news during the day but hands over to mostly rightwing pundits in the evening. – Telegraph Group
‘‘Australia has cemented its reputation as the coup capital of the world.’’ Troy Bramston, newspaper commentator