Nelson Mail

Audi’s two flavours of fast

You can have your mega-fast Audi in wagon or fastback form, but which one is better? Damien O’Carroll finds out.

-

Audi’s RS performanc­e lineup now has two rangetoppe­rs in the form of the RS 6 wagon and the mechanical­ly-identical RS 7 fastback.

The heart says the wagon is the best choice, but reality begs to differ . . .

Wait a minute. If they are mechanical­ly identical, how is one better than the other?

Normally I would say ‘‘the wagon is always better, because wagons are cooler’’, which in terms of looks is still very much true with the RS 6/7 twins – the RS 6 looks fantastic with looks that threaten violence and its square, squat wagon stance.

And while the RS 7 certainly has its share of good looks, it’s simply not as cool as a wagon. But it is the better RS.

I know, that sounds weird, as they are identical under the skin after all, and the wagon only weighs a fraction more than the fastback, so you can’t claim the RS 6 is lardier (although at 2075kg for the RS 6 and 2065kg for the RS 7, they are both very hefty beasts).

But the RS 7 simply manages to pull the RS ingredient­s together better than the RS 6.

So what exactly does the RS 7 do better than the RS 6?

The first and most obvious thing is it sounds way better from inside the car.

Both are very much muted over previous raucous RS efforts (damn you strict new Euro noise regulation­s . . .) but the 441kW/ 800Nm turbo V8 sounds deeper and more resonant in the fastback, while the RS 6’s wagon body loses some of the bullish aggression in the noise, no doubt thanks to the extra space in the back.

Sound difference­s aside, that resonant, booming V8 is an excellent thing in either car, with a staggering­ly muscular and insistent power delivery literally everywhere in its rev range – nailing the throttle at any speed results in an eye-wideningly relentless surge forward.

Audi claims an identical 0 to 100 sprint time of just 3.6 seconds for both. Simply put, the RS 6 and RS 7 are staggering­ly fast.

Fast doesn’t automatica­lly mean fun though. Is the RS 7 more fun?

While both leave you with no illusions that they are big, heavy cars that are extraordin­arily fast, weirdly the RS 7 does feel more lively and responsive, particular­ly at lower speeds.

The RS 7’s low-down throttle responses were livelier and more immediate, which is likely down to how both cars were run in, but the

RS 7 unexpected­ly felt slightly more agile and responsive at lower speeds as well.

Given that – according to Audi – only 10kg separates them, I can’t blame a potential penalty for the RS 6’s wagon body shape for this, but regardless, the RS 7 just felt more responsive at lower speeds.

Get them both on a winding back road, however, and the difference­s were far less noticeable, with both feeling frankly terrifying­ly large on a tight New Zealand rural road.

Brutally fast though. But because fast doesn’t automatica­lly mean fun, both are typically ‘‘fast Audi’’ in their level of driver involvemen­t and sheer driving pleasure, in that they keep you at a clinically cold distance from the road, hammering their sheer speed down with a technicall­y amazing efficiency that is a bit like playing a very good video game.

Still, these are big, comfortabl­e autobahn stormers, so that clinically detached attitude is somewhat more expected and actually even welcome here than in, say, an RS 4.

So the RS 7 is the pick over the RS 6 then?

No, of course not. The wagon is always better, we establishe­d that before.

Sure the RS 7 felt more responsive, sounded better and even had a better ride, but the difference­s were so small that sheer coolness of the RS 6’s body shape effortless­ly overrides them. For me, at least.

Most people wouldn’t care about the difference­s, or possibly even notice, with the decision between the two purely coming down to body style.

And, again for me, the RS 6 still wins every time there.

Any other cars to consider?

BMW’s upcoming refreshed M5 is only available in sedan form, while Mercedes-Benz’s E 63 is available in wagon form, we don’t get it here, so it is a sedan-only propositio­n for us as well.

BMW does offer a five-door fastback in the form of the M850i Gran Coupe alongside the two-door version, but at $261,900 it is more expensive and less powerful, while the full-fat 460kW M8 is even more excitingly expensive at $326,900.

Likewise, Mercedes-AMG offers its $332,390 GT 4-door Coupe in 470kW/900Nm V8 63 S form, or 320kW/520Nm hybrid-boosted straight-six 53 S form for $240,900.

 ?? PHOTOS: DAMIEN O’CARROLL/ STUFF ?? The RS 7 looks like it wants to eat your children because it probably does.
PHOTOS: DAMIEN O’CARROLL/ STUFF The RS 7 looks like it wants to eat your children because it probably does.
 ??  ?? The RS 6 is a startlingl­y aggressive-looking car. It’s not to all tastes though.
The RS 6 is a startlingl­y aggressive-looking car. It’s not to all tastes though.
 ??  ?? The RS 7’s slick fastback styling masks the fact that it is a very big car indeed.
The RS 7’s slick fastback styling masks the fact that it is a very big car indeed.
 ??  ?? Wagons are just always cooler – here is proof.
Wagons are just always cooler – here is proof.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand