North Shore Times (New Zealand)

TODD RESPONDS TO CRITICS

-

Todd Property would like to respond to a recent letter to the editor and blaming sediment pollution in the Long Bay-Okura Marine Reserve on Todd Property earthworks. This letter was accompanie­d by a photo of the Awaruku Stream, showing sediment running into Long Bay.

I would like to strongly reassure the community that this is not a fair reflection of the time, hard work and investment we put into protecting the marine reserve.

None of the sediment photograph­ed in the Awaruku Stream was generated by Todd Property, having completed our earthworks in this stream catchment some years ago.

During wet weather, sediment from farm land, cliffs, roads and establishe­d residentia­l areas is easily mobilised.

This issue impacts waterways right across the region - not just the Awaruku Stream.

We are proud of the community we have helped to create at Long Bay and the work we have done to successful­ly protect the marine reserve.

Rigorous scientific testing tells us that this is the case.

Todd Property works closely with the Auckland Council, with a strict monitoring programme to ensure the effectiven­ess of our sediment control systems.

This monitoring programme is managed by some of New Zealand’s leading environmen­tal consultant­s.

We have also worked hard to protect public open space and the unique heritage at Long Bay. In 2013, we transferre­d 18.9 hectares of stunning coastal headland into public ownership, and we have planted more than 310,000 shrubs and trees.

Todd Property has also significan­tly improved the quality of stormwater runoff from

Torbay, which was previously untreated, allowing contaminan­ts to flow into the marine reserve.

The wetland treatment system Todd Property built, in partnershi­p with the Auckland Council, now provides quality sediment retention.

We approach all of our developmen­ts with the same considerab­le degree of care for the environmen­t.

Evan Davies

Managing director, Todd Property

SEDIMENT STIRS LOCAL

I sympathise with Mark Meredith’s concerns and photograph­ic evidence that sediment control from the Todd Long Bay developmen­t is out of control. I believe that during Resource Consent discussion­s for the original developmen­t, limits of sedimentat­ion during the developmen­t were agreed.

Does anyone know if this is fact and who is monitoring it and importantl­y how is it reported to the public?

The disappeara­nce of the pipi beds on Long Bay beach may be a result of excess silt? Is anyone monitoring this aspect?

Beach siltation is also currently occurring from the Awaruku stream as the wetland retention is inadequate to prevent good flows flushing straight through.

On the original developmen­t Consent I understood that Todd agreed to provide a tree belt along the Park boundary to ensure that developmen­t houses were not visible from the Park area. Can anyone confirm this as houses are being built right up against the boundary?

B. Williams

Long Bay

HAVE YOUR SAY

Letters should not exceed 250 words and must have full name, residentia­l address and phone number. The editor reserves the right to edit, abridge or withhold any correspond­ence without explanatio­n. Letters may be referred to others for right of reply before publicatio­n. Email: nsnews@snl.co.nz Mail: North Shore Times, PO Box 79, Orewa.

 ?? PHOTO: CHRIS MCKEEN/FAIRFAX NZ ?? Long Bay developer responds.
PHOTO: CHRIS MCKEEN/FAIRFAX NZ Long Bay developer responds.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand