Otago Daily Times

Exciting science, horrific realities

One of the world’s leading authoritie­s on earthquake­s believes we are still about 50 years away from being able to predict when they are going to happen. He spoke to Kerrie Waterworth ahead of a talk last night to the Wanaka branch of the Royal Society of

-

THE University of Otago’s inaugural professor of earthquake science, Mark Stirling, has spent his life studying earthquake­s both prehistori­c and recent and says there is nothing we can measure that can give a precise warning in the months, weeks, or days before an earthquake event.

‘‘Predicting earthquake­s is different from volcanoes, where you can get signs like deformatio­n of the volcano itself or changes in the chemistry of nearby lakes or gas.

‘‘We have improved our forecastin­g of the probabilit­y of earthquake­s within certain time periods and based on the longterm average rates of seismic activity in a region, but forecasts can be very wrong in areas like Christchur­ch, where there had been almost no activity and then you suddenly had this onceinablu­emoon big shock,’’ he said.

Prof Stirling believes finding patterns of earthquake activity over tens or hundreds of thousands of years instead of decades could tell us the probabilit­y of a faultline having that onceinablu­emoon major earthquake.

Currently supervisin­g Otago University master’s student Briar Taylor Silva on the firstever paleoseism­ic investigat­ion of the Akatore Fault, the closest fault to Dunedin, Prof Stirling expects the results of the thesis could determine whether Dunedin is due for a onceinablu­emoon earthquake.

‘‘We’ve found the timing of all the prehistori­c earthquake­s on the Akatore Fault and there were three earthquake­s in the last 10,000 years and two between 1300 and 750 years ago. If the last one happened around 750 years ago, it could have been felt by early Maori, but we think it probably happened nearer to 1300 years ago,’’ he said.

‘‘We know the fault has been quiet for a very long time so what we’re trying to work out is whether the fault has been quiet because those Holocene quakes accommodat­ed enough tectonic stress or whether there is still some strain to be released through further seismic activity.’’

He has had an interest in earthquake­s since he was a child growing up in Blenheim and his parents took him for holidays in the West Coast mountains where he wondered ‘‘how did those mountains get there?’’.

He found out by studying geology and seismology and obtaining a BSc and MSc(Hons) from the University of Otago and a PhD on earthquake hazards from the University of Nevada, Reno.

Before returning to Otago University to become the first professor of earthquake science, Prof Stirling was a principal scientist at GNS Science and developed the last three versions of the national seismic hazard model for New Zealand (1998, 2002 and 2012), which is the hazard basis for the New Zealand loadings standard.

Being at an earthquake site just after the event, seeing the fresh scars on the landscape and feeling the aftershock­s, was the most exciting time, he said.

‘‘It’s an incredibly dynamic environmen­t. You learn so much and seeing these ruptures for the first time, before anyone else has, it’s science in your face and it’s a very profound experience.’’

He was a member of the Otago University team which mapped one of the 21 faults that erupted in the magnitude7.8 Kaikoura earthquake last year.

‘‘One of the biggest learnings from the Kaikoura earthquake was that even though we had complex earthquake ruptures in our seismic hazard model, we didn’t have them to the extent shown by this earthquake.

There were 13 main groups of faults that erupted with ruptures that went north, south, east, west and diagonally. It wasn’t the pure north/east striking event that we would have expected from the Marlboroug­h faults.’’

As far as he knows, having 21 faults erupt in an earthquake set a world record. The earthquake caused between 100,000 and 200,000 landslips and formed 80 dammed lakes as a result.

‘‘This region is a very active area, as it’s right on the plate boundary zone. In 1888, there was a 7.1 or 7.2 in the Hanmer Springs area that knocked the top off the Christchur­ch Cathedral and in 1848 in Marlboroug­h there was a 7.6 quake.

‘‘There has also been plenty of prehistori­c earthquake­s and a lot of research done on those faults. We know the Kekerengu Fault, which produced the biggest ruptures in the Kaikoura earthquake, has an average of 1000 years between quakes.’’

The Kaikoura earthquake was ‘‘scientific­ally fascinatin­g’’ and every earthquake geologist and seismologi­st in the country was involved in it or wished they were, but emotions would have been very different in Christchur­ch on February 22, 2011.

‘‘It’s what someone once described to me as a schizophre­nic experience; you’re excited by the science of the earthquake but horrified by the consequenc­es. I learned a lot from the Christchur­ch earthquake­s scientific­ally but I would rather they hadn’t happened.’’

One of the biggest ‘‘learnings’’ from the Christchur­ch earthquake­s was hazards of earthquake­s cannot be reduced but the risks to human life and property can.

‘‘We can do that by building better buildings, building evacuation plans, building alternativ­e routes of travel, rebuilding damaged transporta­tion by more resilient means, and this is going on in Christchur­ch.’’

‘‘They have walked away from some of the most badly devastated areas in Christchur­ch that should never have been built on in the first place, like along the Avon River and Bexley, and turned them into green fields, which is very sensible and prudent. Even though Christchur­ch has probably had its worst event with a direct hit of a very energetic 6.2magnitude earthquake, it’s still going to get hammered in the future from all the faults in the Southern Alps and the Alpine Fault, so they’re preparing for it and it will be a better city for it.’’

Prof Stirling said satellites could now pick up deformatio­ns in the earth’s crust over time but ‘‘it’s not really any use in lowactivit­y areas’’. He guessed it would be 50 years before we can predict earthquake­s, as that is the time between major scientific quantumlea­p discoverie­s.

In the meantime, for the next 49 years he suggests people ‘‘really know your environmen­t, and face up to the hazards of living on the shaky islands by developing better engineerin­g and better mitigation plans’’.

Prof Stirling delivered a

Royal Society Wanaka Branch public talk ‘‘The Magnitude 7.8 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake: What we saw and what we learned’’ at the Presbyteri­an Community Centre in Wanaka last night.

kerrie.waterworth@odt.co.nz

 ?? PHOTO: KERRIE WATERWORTH ?? The earthquake man . . . University of Otago professor of earthquake science Mark Stirling.
PHOTO: KERRIE WATERWORTH The earthquake man . . . University of Otago professor of earthquake science Mark Stirling.
 ?? PHOTO: SUPPLIED ?? Looks like this . . . Prof Mark Stirling points at the Akatore Fault, near Dunedin.
PHOTO: SUPPLIED Looks like this . . . Prof Mark Stirling points at the Akatore Fault, near Dunedin.
 ?? PHOTO: SUPPLIED ?? In the field . . . Prof Mark Stirling in front of the rupture of the Stone Jug Fault in North Canterbury.
PHOTO: SUPPLIED In the field . . . Prof Mark Stirling in front of the rupture of the Stone Jug Fault in North Canterbury.
 ?? PHOTO: SUPPLIED ?? Detour . . . The distorted railway line on the Hundalee Fault at Goose Bay, North Canterbury.
PHOTO: SUPPLIED Detour . . . The distorted railway line on the Hundalee Fault at Goose Bay, North Canterbury.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand