Otago Daily Times

Media diversity in public’s interest

-

THE strong draft decision from the Commerce Commission last year rejecting the proposed merger between the giants of New Zealand media, Fairfax and NZME, sent a clear message about the importance of media plurality. The commission has since twice delayed making its final deliberati­on. May 2 is now the due date. So what has changed?

It is worth reiteratin­g the breadth and depth of ownership that would result: 90% of daily newspapers, most community papers, the Sunday papers, the farandaway dominant news websites (stuff.co.nz and nzherald.co.nz) and half the commercial radio stations, including Newstalk ZB, ZM, Radio Sport, the Hits, Coast.

The commission examined this situation and, tellingly, chairman Mark Berry said the merger would result in ‘‘an unpreceden­ted level of media concentrat­ion for a wellestabl­ished lib eral democracy’’ and a print concentrat­ion unique outside China.

As well, the merged entity would have indirect control over much of the national content provided to the remaining independen­tlyowned print media that rely on this content for their regional audiences.

Fairfax, in particular, put its eggs in one basket when it promoted its digitalfir­st strategy and undermined its newspapers through diminishin­g their resources and talking them down. Unfortunat­ely, that basket was tipped over as Facebook and Google scooped up most of the digital advertisin­g.

Somehow, the merger is supposed to be crucial in allowing the new company the scale and the time to deal with falling revenues. While costs will reduce with staff cuts, including no doubt many journalist­s, buying some time will not solve underlying issues.

In fact, continued competitio­n could well prompt survival strategies, innovation and ways of coping with the changed and changing media landscape. There is little, for example, to stop more collaborat­ion, alongside healthy rivalry and news and advertisin­g competitio­n. Before the Australian owners applied their foreign models to the New Zealand scene, there was national news cooperatio­n and a vigorous, joint national advertisin­g voice for newspapers.

Necessity has forced collaborat­ion through shared printing presses. Fairfax’s Southland Times, for example, is printed by Allied Press in Dunedin and several Fairfax newspapers use NZME’s Ellerslie printing press. There is also cooperatio­n between NZME and Fairfax on one digital advertisin­g mechanism. Cooperatio­n for financial savings can be extended without single ownership, and can include independen­t papers like this one.

Fairfax and NZME continue to pressure the commission, and they have argued the commission is beyond its powers in considerin­g public policy — the potential loss of news plurality under one owner — rather than just matters commercial.

Radio New Zealand, Television New Zealand and Mediaworks (TV and radio) provide some mainstream and national news competitio­n. But they all lack the depth of either Fairfax or NZME, and the penetratio­n regionally and locally. Apart from Mediaworks radio stations and in limited markets, competitio­n for print and radio advertisin­g also would be dominated by a combined company.

Other news websites have emerged, some with quality content. But they are strictly limited in their reach, being read by news enthusiast­s rather than the mainstream. As the commission’s draft determinat­ion said, ‘‘it is the authority, reach and sustained, consistent and comprehens­ive activity of the larger establishe­d players which often give those stories national prominence and currency’’.

The necessary plurality, if anything, becomes more important as commercial pressures increase. A range of strong voices are required if media is to play its crucial traditiona­l role for the benefit of citizens and the community of holding the powerful to account.

Fairfax and NZME should face the challengin­g future independen­tly. And if that future is as bad as Fairfax seems to be claiming, then it still has the choice of getting out. The bottom line is that the interests of consumers would be worse served if the merger is approved.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand