Otago Daily Times

Palestinia­ns risking their lives to make a point when all else fails

- Gwynne Dyer is an independen­t London journalist.

WHEN all is lost, entire communitie­s sometimes engage in suicidal gestures. It happened as recently as 1906 in Bali, when the local royal family and thousands of their followers, knowing they could not defeat the Dutch conquerors, dressed in their best finery and walked straight into the Dutch gunfire. Thousands were killed.

It has been happening again in the past six weeks in the area in front of the border fence that divides the Gaza Strip from Israel. It reached at least a temporary climax last Monday, when some 2000 Palestinia­ns were wounded, about half by gunfire, and 60 were shot dead by Israeli soldiers.

That is at least 1000 unarmed Palestinia­n civilians struck by Israeli bullets in a single day. One Israeli soldier was lightly injured by a rock or a piece of shrapnel.

Even before the ‘‘March of Return’’ began in late March, the Israeli Government said the march was just a cover for terrorists to cross into its territory and carry out terrorist attacks. Soldiers would therefore be allowed to fire live ammunition against anybody trying to damage the border fence, which included anybody coming within 300m of it.

There have been unconfirme­d reports that the army was later told to shoot only people coming within 100m of the fence, which would involve maybe only half the people in the crowd. But the basic story was unchanged: those clever Hamas terrorists had figured out that the best way to sneak into Israel is to break through the border in broad daylight and make their way past thousands of heavily armed Israeli soldiers on full alert.

So anybody in the crowd could be shot if identified as a ‘‘key agitator’’, even if he or she posed no immediate threat to the soldiers. Indeed, the army, presumably using topsecret equipment that let them identify the dead while other Palestinia­ns carried them away, claimed that 24 of the 60 Palestinia­ns killed on Monday were ‘‘terrorists with documented terror background’’.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defends the slaughter on the grounds Hamas ‘‘intends to destroy Israel and sends thousands to breach the border fence in order to achieve this goal’’. If he truly believes they could destroy Israel that way, then the country must be far weaker than anybody thought. But he is getting away with this nonsense because Israel’s allies refuse to call him on it.

The French Government has called on Israel to ‘‘exercise discernmen­t and restraint in the use of force that must be strictly proportion­ate’’. The British Government said ‘‘the large volume of live fire is extremely concerning. We continue to implore Israel to show greater restraint’’.

The comments of Donald Trump’s soninlaw Jared Kushner, who was in Israel to celebrate the opening of the new US embassy in Jerusalem, were even more anodyne. He just ignored the carnage happening at the border and restricted himself to saying ‘‘the United States stands with Israel because we both believe in freedom’’.

But the prize for Most Revealing Remark must go to Khalil alHayya, a senior official in the Hamas party that rules the Gaza Strip: ‘‘We say clearly today to all the world that the peaceful march of our people lured the enemy into shedding more blood’’. Note the word ‘‘lured’’. At the leadership level, both sides see this ghastly event mainly in terms of political theatre.

Hamas wanted the Israelis to commit a massacre of innocent civilians for its propaganda value. The Israeli army, well aware this was Hamas’ goal, ordered its soldiers to shoot to injure, not to kill, whenever possible. The final score shows they largely obeyed: if they had just randomly fired into the crowd, about one in five of the victims would have been killed, not one in 40.

Neverthele­ss it was a massacre, but the Palestinia­n civilians who were being maimed or killed were willing victims. The mostly young men and women in the crowd milling around in front of the border fence, which peaked at an estimated 40,000 people, knew they stood a fair chance of being killed or crippled, but they just did not care any more.

It is 70 years now since the grandparen­ts of these young Palestinia­ns were driven from what is now Israel, and they know that they are never going back to their ancestral homes.

Internatio­nal law says refugees have that right, whether they fled voluntaril­y (as Israel insists) or were expelled by force or the threat of force (as most other people believe), but in practice it is just not going to happen. Israel is far too strong.

Most of the current generation know they are never going ‘‘home’’, and will have to live out their lives in what amounts to a notverylar­ge openair prison: the Gaza Strip. It is only natural they are in despair, and inviting death or injury at the hands of Israeli troops seems like an honourable way out.

 ?? PHOTO: REUTERS ?? Under siege . . . Palestinia­n demonstrat­ors run from tear gas fired by Israeli forces during a protest at the IsraelGaza border in the southern Gaza Strip last week.
PHOTO: REUTERS Under siege . . . Palestinia­n demonstrat­ors run from tear gas fired by Israeli forces during a protest at the IsraelGaza border in the southern Gaza Strip last week.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand