Savings from higher Kiwi Build standards
WELLINGTON: Almost $700 million in pollution and power bill savings could be lost if Kiwi Build Homes are made to only meet New Zealand’s minimum building standards, a report says.
It said the Government’s plan to construct 100,000 ‘‘affordable’’ Kiwi Build homes, priced at up to $650,000, provided a chance to help raise national building standards.
To do this, the homes should be built to a higher quality, independent standard, called Homestar, rather than the New Zealand Building Code, the report by economic consultants Sense Partners said.
Overall savings by doing so could total $680 million.
Kiwi Build home owners would save on electricity and water bills and the community would benefit from reduced climate change pollution, waste and water runoff.
Report author Shamubeel Eaqub said it was an economic ‘‘no brainer’’ to build the homes to a higher standard, despite the increased up front costs.
He said Kiwi Build’s scale of construction would drive down costs, while also enhancing capability in the housing sector.
‘‘We have to start now, else we will be locking in inefficiencies for many decades to come,’’ he said.
The release of the report and its presentation at industry forum The Housing Summit tomorrow is likely to raise further questions about New Zealand’s building code.
The is recognised as lagging behind international standards, having been criticised by the International Energy Agency and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the report said.
Andrew Eagles, chief executive of the New Zealand Green Building Council, which oversees Homestar, said the Government must seize the opportunity to construct the Kiwi Build homes to a higher standard than the building code.
‘‘Doing so will deliver higher quality homes and millions of dollars of benefits for New Zealanders,’’ he said.
He said the Homestar standard measures the health, warmth and efficiency of New Zealand houses.
Homes scoring a rating of six or higher ‘‘will be better quality — warmer, drier, healthier and cost less to run — than a typical new house built to [the] building code’’, he said. — NZME