Otago Daily Times

Immigratio­n NZ refuses to reconsider nurse’s status

- SALLY RAE sally.rae@odt.co.nz

TAIERIBASE­D nurse Pawandeep Chander does not have the right to request reconsider­ation after her applicatio­n for a work visa was declined, Immigratio­n New Zealand says.

Mrs Chander (24) faces deportatio­n to India as her husband Harjinder’s employment as herd manager on a Woodside dairy farm was deemed ‘‘lower skilled’’, meaning her applicatio­n was declined.

Mr Chander (28), who also has a commerce degree, has worked for dairy farmer Mark Adam for nearly six years and is highly regarded by Mr Adam.

The couple married in India in December 2016 and Mrs Chander moved to Otago in August last year.

The Otago Daily Times asked INZ whether the decision would be reconsider­ed and/or whether an appeal on humanitari­an grounds would be considered.

In response, INZ manager Michael Carley said Mr Chander was declined for a work visa under the South Island Contributi­on work category due to not meeting the requiremen­ts set out in the immigratio­n instructio­ns.

Under that work visa category, applicants must have undertaken fulltime employment in the South Island as the holder of an Essential Skills visa, for five years between May 22, 2012, and May 22, 2018. He fell nine months and 12 days short of that requiremen­t, Mr Carley said.

While he held an Essential Skills work visa, his occupation was assessed by INZ as a skill level 5 position (lowerskill­ed).

That meant his wife was not eligible for a work visa on the basis of her relationsh­ip with him. Additional­ly, she had not previously held a visa on the basis of that relationsh­ip.

Mrs Chander was unlawfully in New Zealand as of June 24 and therefore did not have the right to request reconsider­ation, he said.

She could appeal against her liability for deportatio­n on humanitari­an grounds to the Immigratio­n and Protection Tribunal no later than 42 days after first being unlawfully in the country.

Mr and Mrs Chander approached Dunedin South MP Clare Curran’s office for assistance late last week.

Yesterday, Ms Curran said informatio­n from INZ indicated they could request considerat­ion under section 61 of the Immigratio­n Act — (that section said INZ might consider granting a visa under that section but only in ‘‘special’’ cases) or appeal to the tribunal.

She encouraged Mrs Chander to investigat­e options to meet requiremen­ts to obtain registrati­on as a nurse in New Zealand.

National immigratio­n spokesman Michael Woodhouse late yesterday said he had offered to support the couple in their issues with INZ.

‘‘As minister of immigratio­n for nearly five years, I have a pretty good working knowledge of visa policy and instructio­ns and am keen to both understand why INZ declined the visa and, on the basis of what I know of their case, advocate for them.’’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand