There is nothing stable about the US president
Donald Trump’s rhetoric when discussing the Russian president is straight out of young adult stories about high school breakups, Gina Barreca writes.
‘‘IS it too late to call?’’
‘‘No. I figured you’d need to talk. Go ahead.’’
‘‘I can’t tell if he likes me or is just using me. There are a million reasons we should be together, but, sure, I know he’s a player. Destroying people after he uses them, which is his M.O., is part of what makes me want to beat him at his own game. Everybody tells me he’ll respect me more if I play hard to get. I want to keep my boundaries intact but I can no longer tell where I end and he begins.’’
Are these notes excerpted from my ninthgrade journal when I had a crush on the weirdly seductive, sociopathic guy or are they a transcript of a conversation between Donald Trump and Fox News’ Sean Hannity after Trump’s meeting with Putin in Helsinki?
Is it hard to decide? Review the sentence structure: You’ll find embedded clauses, proving it’s me in ninth grade. If it were Trump, the only thing embedded would be the operatives.
Trump’s rhetoric, if we can call it that, when addressing and discussing the Russian president, is straight out of young adult stories about high school breakups. Either that or it’s from Divorce for Dummies.
In Helsinki, Trump said: ‘‘We’ve all been foolish’’ and ‘‘We’re all to blame.’’ Sounding as if he learned to repeat these phrases phonetically during disastrous marriage counselling sessions, Trump takes zero responsibility. He blames those outside the immediate troubled relationship for whatever has failed within it.
Calling [Loveline host] Dr Drew!
That’s how Trump justified saying, about America and Russia, that ‘‘(We’ve) both made some mistakes.’’
My Facebook friend Marybeth Valentine immediately noticed that.
‘‘This sounds like something you say to an exgirlfriend.’’
Marybeth also believes a larger breakup is looming, since she thinks the Grand Old Party will ‘‘cut him loose soon after they force their choice for the Supreme Court through Congress and
Trump scrawls his Sharpie across the page. After all, Grover
Norquist said that’s all they needed, someone with enough functioning digits to handle a pen.’’
Sherry Louise, friend, former English major, mother of three and retired United States Air Force captain, is worried that Trump will ‘‘break up with our country in a tweet: ‘‘Listen, USA, I never said we were ‘exclusive’. But will we have any allies left to tell us, ‘We deserve better?’ ’’
Personally, and despite the fact that, as an ItalianFrenchCanadian mix who was raised Roman Catholic I am terribly at home feeling guilty, I do not feel
‘‘to blame’’ in this case, nor do I feel as if ‘‘we’’ made ‘‘some mistakes’’.
Putin and Trump are to blame and they made mistakes.
I am more in agreement with my pal from college, Drea Thorn, who is bothered by Trump’s perpetual use of false equivalences.
‘‘Trump is like a husband saying to his wife, ‘Sure, I was caught pants down with a prostitute, but you bought a Rolex, ordered hardback books and have weird ears.’ The situations are not analogous.’’
I also agree with author and retired Marine, Ray L’Heureux, who says this follows a long history of foolishness.
‘‘There was that little skirmish in Southeast Asia that never had to happen, for example. And here we are today.’’
The words of another college friend, Dave Borland, are also chilling.
‘‘The right wing in America — especially the evangelical ‘Christians’ — actually admires Putin. He represents what they want Trump to be: the takenoprisoners, antiminority, antigay, antiliberal DefenderoftheFaith in a white Christian state.’’
Remember being told in high school about that whole birdsofafeatherflocking notion?
And do you also remember how in June 2013, this moist, dewy and syrupy tweet from Trump seemed hilariously adolescent: ‘‘Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant ... if so, will he become my new best friend?’’
Maybe it’s not very funny to have America run by a guy who is emotionally, psychologically — or perhaps more frightening, financially, sexually, politically — in thrall to or owned by a more powerful person. In 2015 Trump referred to Putin as his ‘‘stablemate.’’
I’d omit the word ‘‘stable’’. Otherwise it sounds about right.