Coming, ready or not
For displaced Syrians, the offer to return home presents agonising choices, writes Alexandra Zavis, of the Los Angeles Times, in Arsal.
A public spat has arisen between members of the Lebanese Government and United Nations refugee agency UNHCR as Lebanese and Syrian security forces start repatriating Syrian refugees. Syria is not ready, says the UNHCR; the Lebanese economy is collapsing, says the Government.
STANDING in a crush of trucks and cars, Khadija Rifai watched her sons load a beatup minivan with crates of lettuce, tomatoes and zucchini.
After four years as refugees in Lebanon, she and her husband were about to join a convoy home to Syria. But five sons and four daughters with families of their own were staying behind in the Lebanese border town of Arsal.
‘‘Now is not the time for the youth to go back,’’ Rifai said. ‘‘They will have to go into the army, and security is not 100%.’’
Two sons ran up and kissed her hand. Another tucked a few more rounds of flat bread on the dashboard. A niece buried her face in her headscarf and sobbed.
‘‘Don’t worry about me,’’ Rifai told them with a reassuring smile. ‘‘I will be waiting for you in Syria.’’
It was one of many heartwrenching farewells that July day. Now that Syrian President Bashar Assad’s army, backed by Russia and Iran, has recaptured large parts of the country from rebels, Lebanese security forces and their Syrian counterparts have started repatriating refugees to areas where fighting has subsided.
More than 2000 Syrian refugees have left in convoys like the one that left Arsal, part of a small but growing exodus since June.
Defenders of the repatriation programme emphasise that participation is voluntary. But critics contend that mounting hostility toward refugees in Lebanon, and the increasingly harsh restrictions imposed on them, make many feel that they have no choice but to go back to a country still fighting a war that began in 2011.
The agonising decision over whether to stay or go has divided families like the Rifais, touching off a public spat between members of the Lebanese government and the United Nations refugee agency UNHCR, which says conditions in Syria are not stable enough to organise returns.
Last month, Russia waded into the melee, offering to facilitate the return of more than
1.7 million refugees from Syria’s neighbours and Europe in the ‘‘near future’’. That is welcome news to countries like Lebanon that border Syria and host most of the displaced.
As the United States and European nations closed to refugees, more than 5 million Syrians poured into neighbouring countries. Tiny Lebanon welcomed more than a million, and refugees make up almost a quarter of the population.
But the country’s economy, never robust, has been hurt by the war next door. As fighting drags on, public resentment is building against refugees, who are seen as taking jobs, even if menial ones, and driving down wages. The UN has provided billions of dollars in aid but donor contributions have not kept pace with growing needs.
‘‘Our economy is collapsing. Why do we have to wait?’’ Lebanese Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil said on a visit to Arsal in June.
Underpinning much of the hostility are fears that the influx of Syrians, most of them Sunni Muslims, will upset the delicate sectarian balance in Lebanon, which fought its own civil war from 1975 to 1990.
In June, Bassil ordered a freeze on the processing of residency applications by UNHCR employees, accusing the agency of dissuading refugees from going home by asking them questions about the conditions they will face, including the security risks and the possibility of losing aid.
UNHCR officials deny that, saying the goal of such interviews is to understand the concerns refugees have and offer help when they can.
‘‘If a refugee decides he wants to go back . . . we don’t try to change their mind,’’ said Rula Amin, a UNHCR spokeswoman based in Amman, Jordan. ‘‘We respect their decision.’’
However, Amin said the UNHCR would need to see some safeguards before it started organising the returns.
‘‘It’s not just about active combat,’’ she said.
‘‘Asylum seekers are sometimes entitled to asylum even if there is no war in their country — if they are persecuted, if they don’t have their rights, if they show that there’s a threat to their life.’’
Russia has provided few details about its proposals, presented after President Vladimir Putin’s recent summit with President Donald Trump in Helsinki. But the move appears to be part of a Russian gambit to legitimise Assad in the eyes of the United States and its allies, ease sanctions imposed on his government and raise money for reconstruction.
‘‘People want to return to their homes,’’ the Kremlin’s special envoy for Syria, Alexander Lavrentyev, said recently, according to Russia’s Tass news agency. ‘‘It is also in the interests of European nations to offer assistance to the return of Syrian refugees to their homeland and create corresponding conditions for that.’’
The destruction in cities such as Homs and Aleppo, pummelled by shelling and airstrikes, is massive. The World Bank estimated last year it would cost $US200 billion ($NZ300 billion) to $US350 billion to rebuild. But the UN and European Union, where about a million Syrian refugees live, are withholding reconstruction money until a credible political solution is reached.
Russian officials say the refugees have nothing to fear from Assad’s government, but many dispute that. Those who returned to oppositionheld areas in recent years were frequently displaced anew — and in some cases killed — in government offensives, according to New Yorkbased Human Rights Watch.
Some refugees fear they could be arrested, tortured or killed if they go back. Others worry about how they will rebuild homes damaged or destroyed in the fighting and stripped down to the wiring by looters.
Many of those leaving are elders or children. For men of fighting age, one of the biggest fears is being drafted into Assad’s army. The government has offered them a sixmonth grace period to get their affairs in order.
Meanwhile, living conditions in Lebanon have grown increasingly harsh. New regulations have barred refugees from whitecollar jobs and made residency permits difficult to obtain. Education options are limited and healthcare prohibitively expensive for many.
Authorities have refused to set up camps for Syrians, citing the experience with camps for Palestinians that turned into permanent neighbourhoods.
Syrians with means rent houses and apartments. But hundreds of thousands are crammed into makeshift dwellings, including tents, shacks and unused factories. They are still required to pay rent, though. And when tensions flare with host communities, they are sometimes evicted en masse.
Tented settlements dot the landscape in Arsal, tucked in mountainous and rocky terrain on the northern edge of Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley. Its Sunni residents mostly welcomed the refugees, many of whom were relatives.
But the addition of tens of thousands of newcomers to a town with a prewar population of fewer than 40,000 has put a strain on public services, which were never good, according to Mayor Basil Hujeiri. There are not enough schools, and residents have electricity for only about 12 hours a day.
Just over 3000 of the town’s refugees have registered to go home but their applications must first be vetted by authorities in Syria, the mayor said.
Early on their appointed day, departing refugees assemble at a checkpoint on the edge of town. They travel in cars, trucks and tractors piled high with their belongings — stacks of mattresses, bags of food and clothing, the occasional motorcycle. Lebanese security officers check their identification cards against a list of approved names before allowing them to drive to the border crossing.
The mayor makes a point of accompanying them whenever he can, stopping along the way to inquire after brokendown vehicles and pass out bottles of water to those waiting for help to arrive.
‘‘The most important thing in this situation is nobody is forcing the refugees to go back to Syria,’’ Hujeiri said. ‘‘They go by their own choice.’’ From the point of view of human rights advocates, however, Lebanese authorities are not giving the refugees much of a choice.
‘‘They adopted a set of policies that make it very difficult for refugees to stay in Lebanon, and most of them will, as a result, return,’’ Sara Kayyali, a researcher for Human Rights Watch, said. — TNS