Rohingya reluctant — with good reason
THE Rohingya are about a million Bengalispeaking people who used to live in Rakhine state in Myanmar — until late last year. Then the Myanmar army attacked them, claiming they were illegal immigrants. Thousands were killed, tens of thousands were raped, their villages were burned — and at least 700,000 of them are now in refugee camps across the border in Bangladesh.
The United Nations has described the actions of Myanmar as ‘‘ethnic cleansing’’, ‘‘crimes against humanity’’ and ‘‘genocide’’, but the Myanmar army denies any wrongdoing. So does its civilian political partner, ‘‘Special Counsellor’’ Aung San Suu Kyi. (Remember her? She used to be a secular saint.)
Bangladesh doesn’t want all these refugees, most of whom have no ties with the country although they speak Bengali, so last month it made a deal with Burma to send them back. But Myanmar doesn’t really want them back either. If it did, why would it have bothered to drive them out in the first place?
The United Nations has no part in this great ‘‘repatriation’’, nor any of the NGOs either. It was a private deal between Bangladesh and Myanmar, and the Myanmar army knew perfectly well that the refugees would be too terrified to go back. Agreeing to take them back just made the generals who planned the atrocity look a little less vile.
The Bangladeshi authorities fell for it, and chose 2200 Rohingya refugees to go back in the first contingent. The
Rohingya weren’t fooled, and most of them immediately went into hiding, changing camps or fleeing into the woods.
The Rohingya won’t go back because they are quite understandably afraid for their lives. It wasn’t just the army but their own nonMuslim neighbours who turned on them and took part in the slaughter. If you are recalling images of the massacres and expulsions of Bosnian Muslims by the Bosnian Serbs in the 1990s, you are absolutely right. It’s happening again, and again nobody is doing anything effective to stop it.
How did it come to this? All the southeast Asian countries contain minority groups, but Myanmar takes it to extremes. Bamars (ethnic ‘‘Burmese’’) account for twothirds of the population, but there are eight other recognised ethnic groups, most with their own language or languages. And there are the Rohingya, who were stripped of their citizenship by Myanmar’s military dictatorship in 1982.
Why them? They were only 2% of Myanmar’s population, they were a minority even in Rakhine state (formerly Arakan) where they almost all lived, and they never did any harm to the majority. They are, however, Muslims, and the Buddhist majority in Myanmar is paranoid about Muslims.
It goes back a long way. Buddhism once dominated Asia from the Indian subcontinent to Indonesia, but it has been in retreat for a long time. First Hinduism made a comeback in India, and then Arab conquerors brought Islam to northwestern India.
Islamised Central Asian conquerors spread Islam as far east as Bengal, and finally Malay traders carried it throughout the Indonesian archipelago. The only Buddhistmajority countries left in Asia today are Myanmar, Thailand and Sri Lanka.
It’s not surprising, therefore, that Myanmar’s Buddhists should feel their faith is jeopardised by the presence of even a single million Muslims — especially if rabblerousing Buddhist monks advance their careers by preaching fear and hatred.
It’s also utterly irrational and reprehensible. The Rohingya are just as Burmese, in the broader sense, as any of the recognised minorities.
The first Bengalispeaking Muslims arrived in Rakhine state in the 15th century as soldiers helping an exiled king regain his throne. The last significant wave of immigration was in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
It’s now the 21st century, and there is no excuse for what the Myanmar army has done: to understand all is NOT to forgive all. Neither is there any excuse for Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi.
Yes, she was trying to preserve a hardwon democratic opening that might close if she openly criticised the army. Moreover, the average Myanmar person heartily approves of what the army has done. (Shades of Serbia again.) But she is condoning and covering up a genocide. Shame on her.
A